BonfireOvDreams

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Embrace the paradox, humans are arguably the greatest rights violators in all forms of violence, but they are also the only beings capable of granting rights through moral agency. The paradox is also true of anthropocentric climate change, it's creator, but also it's only possible resolver. The environment only has instrumental value to conscious beings so it would miss the mark to assume the absence of humans is in anyone's (including animals) best interest.

Guess we should just try to get through each others thick skulls instead of being edgy :/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Hella righteous brother 😎👉👉

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Diet

Health

Respond to comment about making healthy/ethical decisions and people's defensiveness about it.

Yeah that seems 'tangentially' related. You sound like the guy the commenter was describing.

Doesnt matter if you dislike vegans. Stop abusing animals 💁🏼‍♂️

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

They are designing the chip of the robot to adjust movement based on information they can gather from the mushroom when it responds to stimuli, not the other way around. The mushroom is not in control of the robot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Zero sum game that requires my own death to achieve - seems a reasonable request compared to a request to not participate in the forcible birthing of billions of animals into exploitative confinement until they are killed at our convenience for eternity, or the unecessary trawling of trillions of them.

Or we can seek to achieve what is possible, and work out what isn't over time. You describe a technical problem. That aside can you even empirically prove that more animals die in agricultural fields than in nature? I'm all in favor of reducing those deaths but is it actually any worse than if we let the existing fields reforest? I don't see your point as analogous to my own concerns.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Yeah dude idk how to tell you this but some people actually do have an interest in a sustainable planet and individual's bodily autonomy. Idc if these are foreign ideas to you. OP's post itself is the trolling. If y'all don't want reactionary responses, dont troll this shit to the top post for the last six hours. You've all demonstrated very clearly how little you care about anything outside of your own momentary pleasure.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Oh boy, another dogshit kill animals hehe meme. Very funny maymay community. Psuedoprogressive animal abusers the lot of ya. There is not enough resources on Earth to quench your never ending demand for bodies. Just have ten trillion kids who all definitely have the opportunity to eat just as many animals as you do! Primitive zero brain cell fools. I'd throw you all out of Athens.