BlueSerendipity8

joined 4 months ago
 

Dr Russell Hurlburt is a psychologist, researcher, and one of the leading experts in the study of inner experience.

We all assume we know what’s happening inside our own minds. But what if the way you describe your inner thoughts—your inner monologue, mental images, emotions—isn’t accurate? What if you’ve spent your entire life mischaracterizing your own experience? Russell’s research suggests that most people don’t truly understand how their minds work.

Expect to learn why you might not actually have an inner monologue, the five core phenomena of inner experience, why most psychological self-reports are unreliable, the surprising differences in how people experience thought, how experience sampling can reveal the hidden structure of your mind, whether meditation really increases self-awareness, and the astonishing story of a woman whose perception of reality was forever altered by this method.

This episode will make you question everything you thought you knew about your own mind.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There is a community about aphantasia on Lemmy too: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Other articles on the subject can be found here: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Mental imagery is a spectrum. At one end of the spectrum, you have hyperphantasia, and at the other end, aphantasia. While aphantasics score 1 on the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ) and make up about 1% of the population, hyperphantasics could be around 6% of the population (*). According to your description, I would say that you would score higher than I do on the VVIQ (more than 1 ;-))

(*) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384925233_An_international_estimate_of_the_prevalence_of_differing_visual_imagery_abilities

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I would suggest that someone who does not lack multisensory mental imagery—what scientists refer to even for non-visual senses—may be able to vividly recollect past events from a first-person perspective (often described as a time travel flashback) using the senses that are not affected. Therefore, they may not be severely impacted or affected at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I would say that I do have SDAM, although I don't have an official diagnosis. In fact, I find the 'S' (Severe) label a bit overstated. The reason I identify with SDAM is that I have multisensory aphantasia, which means the only way I can access my past is through semantic memory. I am unable to re-experience past events from any sensory perspective, nor can I project myself into the future in that way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

SDAM Stands for Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory

See also :

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hello @[email protected] , is this community also covering Anauralia or only 'visual aphantasia' ?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree that there is some form of advertising (at least sponsoring) associated with the article, but on the other hand, the point the article is making remains valid and knowledgeable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Cake is an imperative and task-based way of expressing builds. In my opinion, it truly provides its benefits when you have a complex build pipeline. The added value is that any C# developer can understand and contribute to the build process without needing to master bash or PowerShell scripting languages or figure out how to use declarative DSLs like GitHub Actions, AppVeyor, or GitLab CI

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hello,

I’m a 40y with full aphantasia, and I don’t have any issues falling asleep. I have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and use a CPAP, but I’ve never had any trouble falling asleep.

view more: next ›