I try to avoid reviews, but the editor is a close friend of mine and i'm an expert of the topic. The manuscript was only missing the date
BattleGrown
I recently reviewed a paper, for a prestigious journal. Paper was clearly from the academic mill. It was horrible. They had a small experimental engine, and they wrote 10 papers about it. Results were all normalized and relative, key test conditions not even mentioned, all described in general terms.. and I couldn't even be sure if the authors were real (korean authors, names are all Park, Kim and Lee). I hate where we arrived in scientific publishing.
It's super cool! I checked it out and even tried to register but it said registration closed, only admins can add users lol.
Unrelated but wth is going on with the username and instance lol
I'll be that guy, and say abomination. The more twisted the better. Like a mouth in my belly, extra arm on my back kind of twisted. I'll learn to enjoy striking terror in my victims' hearts. Afterlife will be dope.
Late or not, we have to do all we can to stop runaway warming and ecological collapse. We know corporations and populations won't do anything voluntarily. That is why legislation is the only way. EU is taking the lead on this. I'm hoping world countries will follow.
I was there, 3000 years ago \o/
Bro take me back to my timeline i don't like it here