BadmanDan

joined 2 years ago
[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Just a reminder. Male Latinos are literally the reason Trump is in office right now. Kamala had the black and white support to win, but make Latinos swung like 40 pts hard right.

 

I don’t live in Maine, so I have no say in that senate election. But I know it must be really hard for left of center Maine voters right now. But what’s even harder to deal with it, was the consistent victim blaming I’ve seen from the left for the last 6 months or so.

If this was 2015-2022. We wouldn’t have tolerated this type of behavior on the left. But I guess that was the “woke” era, and now we have to be just as sociopathic and dirtbag as MAGA. So many left leaning influencers have lost credibility with their attacks on his accusers. Saying that one of them is a Republican, dosent really hurt her argument because Platner dated her KNOWING she was a Republican.

Before these latest developments. I’ve said I’d still vote for Platner despite his scandals. Even the one about black people tipping which pissed me off. We went through an entire MeToo Movement, and preached to believe victims, but here we are. I guess Trump 2.0 really has done damage to social awareness in politics.

TLDR: How did we allow victim blaming like this to happen on the left?

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why can’t these people stop boring trump with stuff like “governance”. The man is 80, you think he wants to do his job. Just let the man golf in peace

/s

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Bucks.

That’s nothing compared to actually winning the white vote and almost winning the Hispanic vote

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

100% is marketing. Mamdani really isn’t doing any policies that progressive Dems at the local level haven’t already done or tried to do.

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson has damn near an identical policy position as Mamadani, but he’s not promoted by the mainstream media and pundits every week, so the public gives him hell. Holchul literally agreed to absorb NYC’s debt for the entire state to pay off to help Mamdani’s agenda breathe, and the far left still gives her hell, despite her not even having to do that for him.

Politics is deeply unserious today.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

It’s almost like Biden got the most votes ever and 2024 was a red wave year. If Mamdani had ran in 2024, he prolly be less than 50%, still a win, but closer. Thats just how elections are. Candidates rarely overperform wave years against their party.

Kamala could run again in 2028, and with a strong Dem wave, could easily break Biden’s margins. It’s not that complicated.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That’s not true. Black folks are not easily as swayed to republicans because of lgbt issues. Kamala STILL got 85%+ of the black vote.

Whites and Hispanics fall for this shit all the time. Hispanics in 04 and 24. It’s really ridiculous. It dosent matter how good the economy could be doing, social issues will always keep the GOP competitive. 2000 proved this.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

50 PERCENT IN NYC

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Once again, how ya gonna get stuff passed through congress with splitting potential left leaning votes. A majority of this country is conservative.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

What are you talking about? Why do leftist ignore the big elephant in the room when it comes to electoral politics? Trump and the GOP HAVE THE WHITE VOTE. They thrive off racism to win elections. Dems and no other party have that.

Mamdani only got 50% in deep blue New York.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They hate this fact. Mamdani only got 50% in deep blue NYC

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

The Democratic Party has HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of politicians in it. From far left to center right.

 

Yes I know the cliche saying of “every president is war criminal” blah blah blah. But last president atleast were attacked or provoked by recognized threat. Trump has -

  • Tried to coup the US government over election results
  • Sent ICE agents into cities to harass the public
  • Defended ICE killing civilians by labeling victims as “domestic terrorist”
  • Bombed Nigeria on Christmas 2025 (it’s unknown the casualty count), Nigeria did not attack us
  • Illegally invaded Venezuela and kidnapped their leader and his wife, Venezuela did not attack us
  • Is currently starving the country of Cuba with no food, electricity or aid, Cuba did not attack us
  • Is spreading false information about White Genocide in South Africa
  • Killed Iranian Generals in his first term after tearing up Obama’s Iran Peace Deal
  • Bombed a school of little girls in Iran
  • Started a war with Iran, killing their leader, Iran did not attack us
  • Wants to occupy and takeover Greenland, Greenland did not attack us or ask for this
  • Inplements unprofessional and nonsensical tariffs on the Global economy

And so much more. Why dosent social media, traditional media, reddit, lemmy, democrats, ANYBODY ever call this gu ya terrorist. No other president has caused this much global terror in the modern era.

 

Just out of sheer laziness?

 
 

Nina Turner: Dems need to fight more.

Dems Fight More

Nina Turner: How dare Dems fight more!

 
  1. They want $30 a month, a steep increase over what consumers already pay.

  2. ESPN is paying the WWE $200m more than what NBC gives them, FOR LESS, this deal dosen’t include WWE’s achieved library (which has serious value)

  3. Both TKO and ESPN are dealing with sexual harassment/assault cases right now.

  4. The WWE product isn’t necessarily hot right now, and they continue to prove gouge their loyal fans.

Am I missing something here, but this sounds like an incoming disaster of a deal, especially for ESPN.

 

Context, I’m a liberal, who’s voted Democratic every election I’ve been able to.

I’ve constantly see you guys complain and bash Democratic politicians pretty much since the rise of populism with Sanders in 2016.

I just want to know if populism is so great and Democrats are out of touch, and if you ran on just economic populism, and ignore social issues (which the right won’t), you’d easily win every election right? So by that logic, gaining massive support from all sides of the political spectrum should be easy right? Everyone says it’s all about messaging and vibes. And the Dems are failing at both, so wouldn’t right now be the best time to seriously back a fully populist leftist party? If a majority of the country polls high for Medicare for All, by proxy, they should vote for the candidates promising that, and they don’t talk about social issues that might scare off right wingers willing to vote for them.

I just don’t understand the mindset of constantly infighting with us liberals and protest voting hurting our causes. Just start your own party and beat us within YOUR system. We’ll never fully drop social issues, so we’ll never win a fair amount of conservatives, but you guys can.

 

We all see and hear what goes on over there. Kim will execute kids if they don’t cheer hard enough at his birthday party or something? He’s always threatening to nuke countries and is probably has the highest domestic kill count out of any world leader today.

So I ask? Why don’t any other countries step in to help those people. I saw a survey asking Americans and Escaped North Koreans would they migrate to North Korea and to the US if given the chance (hypothetical for the refugees). And it was like <0.1% to 95%. Obviously those people live in terror.

Why do we just allow this to happen in modern civilization? Nukes on South Korea? Is just not lucrative to step in? SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME PLEASE!?

 

If so? Please elaborate.

If not, what would he do different?

 
 
view more: next ›