According to what? The fact that he disagreed with one comment? The dude's post history does not agree with you at all.
Assassassin
joined 2 months ago
You should check out the link that OP posted in reply to me, it was clarifying. It's not that far fetched of an idea when you consider the impact of deglaciation and changes in the location and amount of water relative to hot spots.
Thanks for the good read! I was into volcanology a lot as a kid, but climate change wasn't on my radar back then, so this is all new info to me. I always forget how closely interlinked hydrology can be to volcanology.
How are volcanoes a symptom of global warming? I've never heard this take before
That's the fun part, you can't even escape them by leaving the US!
Easy to say a year after the election
Toilet bowl cleaner for the toilet. Everything else gets simple green and elbow grease.
Huh, interesting. I've always seen iso in divisions of 100, never down to the single digit like that. I guess there's not really any reason not to, it's just odd to see.
Well, that would be a major issue. For one: both apple and Google are on this list, so good luck getting a phone. Not to mention that effectively every grocery store is in bed with the GOP in some way, too. Capitalists love republican policy, and almost all of our ability to choose has been eroded and destroyed by these huge machines of unabashed capitalism.
I'll just repost this comment I made on a similar question earlier: That would be because most wealthy people believe that they did something to "earn" their wealth and that poor people just need to work harder. They refuse to admit that their wealth is built off of the backs of others and a good amount of luck. This also explains a good chunk of Republican policy decisions.
Adding on to that: Republicans see the government as a zero sum entity. If they are paying money into it, they should be receiving an equivalent benefit. If someone else is receiving a benefit that they are not, that is unfair and is effectively equivalent to stealing, since that person doesn't pay as much into the system. The primary and largely singular motivation of the Republican party is to mold the government to only serve them and increase their "ROI" for their taxes. They do not care about the societal good that social programs do, nor about the massive boon that these programs typically are for the economy in the long run. They care that the poors are getting something that they didn't work for because they perceive themselves as paying for it personally.
Tl;dr: republicans are selfish myopic people that are absurdly bad at cost benefit analysis
No
So share the reason.