AllOutOfBubbleGum

joined 2 years ago
[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It hides the problem or else it gets the hose again

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 36 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'd watch this. Not an anime fan, but I bet Simon Pegg would nail the comedy.

Ah, interesting. Had no idea. Thanks.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Interesting. I see bicycle pedals and a chain. Seems it'd function a bit similar to modern e-bikes.

 

https://phys.org/news/2025-03-dark-energy-rattling-view-universe.html

Hello, I'm not sure if this is the best place to post something like this, but here we go. The above link is of new findings from DESI (the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument) that's been written about by a handful of news outlets this week, and the TL;DR is that the expansion of the universe might not be as consistent as previously thought.

My question is: Could it be possible for the overall universe to only look like it's expanding because the expansion is currently happening within our visible universe? And that in other portions of the universe, far outside of our visible universe, it might be stationary, or even contracting?

To put it another way, could it be possible that the universe as a whole is rippling or oscillating, maybe due to the effects of the big bang, and that our visible universe is such a tiny spec, that from our perspective it only appears that the entire universe is expanding?

I've watched a number of talks where astrophysicists have said that the big bang didn't start from a single point and expand outward like it's usually depicted, but that it happened everywhere all at once. So, from my limited understanding, it doesn't seem like that would contradict what we see from the cosmic microwave background (CMB).

Am I way off base here? Or is this one of those questions that simply can't be currently answered?

Thanks in advance.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For me personally, I think it might be for the best that a portion of them can't be bothered. I've watched the quality of Reddit posts and comments erode over the past decade or so. I think one reason is from the user base trending younger. Lemmy feels a bit more like what Reddit was back in the day.

Come on, this isn't Riyadh. They're not gonna saw your hands off, all right? The worst they can do is put you for a couple of months into a while collar, minimum security resort!

 
[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was that kid in my high school years. Teachers were usually pretty cool about it, like they already understood.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Dude, no offense, but that water mark message at the bottom is so silly. There's gotta be better services out there that don't add their own messages. Have you considered just adding your water mark manually with photo editing software? Gimp is free and doesn't take much effort to learn for what you're doing with it. Also, if it's a matter of batch processing, Gimp has a plugin called Bimp that should let you automatically add your water mark to whole collections of images in one go. In any case, not trying to offend. Just hoping this is helpful.

Some fast food places work a bit like this in the sense that you tell them how many meat patties you want. It doesn't change the diameter, but affects the height a fair amount.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I would say not much. If it's your own personal LAN, and only your devices are on it, and you're not hosting super sensitive data, then I wouldn't personally be worried. Just depends on your risk acceptance.

Edit: But if you are hosting sensitive data on an untrusted network, then definitely require a user with a strong password. Also, SMB3 and higher supports encryption (both in Windows and Samba for Linux). Encryption isn't enabled by default, though. So keep that in mind. Easy to setup on both Windows and Linux.

[–] AllOutOfBubbleGum@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

That's a security quirk. Microsoft reeeeeally doesn't want you to do anonymous SMB anymore, and with every version of Windows, Microsoft has made is more complicated to get it working like that. It's probably still possible, but easier just to make a quick local user account and assign it read/write permissions to the share. Samba on Linux can still do it without as much fuss, but I've long since just accepted the extra step.

 

I go to investigate, and they had managed to plug the HDMI cable of one monitor into the other monitor.

 

Dunno if there are any anchovy lovers here, but these were excellent.

view more: next ›