AcidicBasicGlitch

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Yeesh nvm. I need night nights

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Certainly not enough of them. Especially not on smaller levels.

It's a sad fact, but even though so many Democrats claim to be anti establishment, many are in fact part of the establishment and receiving giant donations from banks and corporations.

It's one of the first things AOC pointed out when she was elected.

On the other hand so many Republicans claim to love small government and transparency, but many are also getting funded at the state level by some very shady corporations and groups like SPN and the heritage foundation.

The SPN is a network created by one of the earliest funders of Heritage Foundation. They use money to influence policy at the state level to make it seem like small government and representative of individuals in the state, but really it represents interests of some very powerful people and their corporations.

https://lemm.ee/post/59677728

I'm not saying any of this as an attack on people with views that lean democratic or Republican. I only point it out because we all need to shift away from the idea of treating politics and politicians as a sports team that we have to support bc they're representing "our team."

Its kind of a sunken cost fallacy to keep supporting a team that won a championship decades ago when you realize lately they seem to be throwing a lot of games. Except with sports it is a team paid to represent a local city or state.

Politicians are humans like anyone else. There's good and bad ones and they're capable of corruption and change just like anyone else.

Black and white thinking is what got us here and what keeps dividing us as a country while individuals continue to profit from it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

So maybe we need some legislative action to push for caps on CEO salaries and number of CEO/administrative positions per hospital to receive any federal or state funding.

Why tf does one giant monopoly of hospitals need a CEO for each campus?!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (13 children)

I'm not saying we should be rasing pay for other employees at all. I'm saying the reason Medicaid is becoming unsustainable is because we have so many CEOs making insanely huge salaries like this.

The point of healthcare is to provide care to patients. Not to create hospital monopolies.

If Medicare is unsustainable that means healthcare cuts.

When you're looking for where you should be making healthcare cuts what makes the most logical sense to you?

At least having a discussion about how these administrative salaries and positions are actually justified?

Or

•Slash and burn policy eliminating doctors that were already accepting Medicaid

•Reducing care offered to patients so that the patients will then indeed become less healthy, rely on emergency services and require more costly care in the long run

•Claiming Medicaid is unsustainable bc "no doctors want to accept Medicaid patients."

If you abruptly eliminate all the doctors that do accept Medicaid and then claim you need to increase the Medicaid budget to incentivise doctors in order to get them to accept Medicaid patients, then yes, by default it becomes easy to make the argument that no doctors in your hospital "want to accept Medicaid."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

References:

Landry announces $11M in savings: https://gov.louisiana.gov/news/4768

https://www.klfy.com/louisiana/gov-jeff-landry-unveils-standstill-budget-emphasizing-fiscal-responsibility/

LA DOGE Secret Meeting with Guidehouse: https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-created-group-meets-in-secret-to-cut-spending/article_920e929c-e32e-11ef-915a-dbb1b1826804.html

LA DOGE partners with LA Legislative Auditor: https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landrys-louisiana-doge-to-work-with-auditors/article_9fae9dc4-f478-11ef-8d56-332511026662.html

LA Legislative Auditor says MCIP funds misspent by hospitals: https://www.nola.com/news/healthcare_hospitals/louisiana-health-department-failed-to-oversee-parts-of-state-medicaid-program-audit-says/article_c59da822-fdfb-11ef-8015-9f4118cb1f63.html

(3/26)Budget to LDH increasing $1.5B despite Landry's saving cuts. Surgeon General Abraham claims need to offer doctors more money to get them to accept Medicaid patients: https://lailluminator.com/2025/03/26/louisiana-medicaid-set-to-grow-under-landry-even-as-d-c-republicans-may-force-cuts/

(3/27) Elon Musk's DOGE website shows $55M in cuts to LDH: https://www.wwno.org/public-health/2025-03-27/doge-website-shows-55m-in-cuts-to-louisiana-department-of-health

Louisiana faces $10M loss for mental health and substance use disorders after federal cuts: https://www.nola.com/news/healthcare_hospitals/louisiana-federal-cuts-health/article_c5a6715f-0c56-4ee7-b36b-1a26be86ace3.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

References:

Landry announces $11M in savings: https://gov.louisiana.gov/news/4768

https://www.klfy.com/louisiana/gov-jeff-landry-unveils-standstill-budget-emphasizing-fiscal-responsibility/

LA DOGE Secret Meeting with Guidehouse: https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-created-group-meets-in-secret-to-cut-spending/article_920e929c-e32e-11ef-915a-dbb1b1826804.html

LA DOGE partners with LA Legislative Auditor: https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landrys-louisiana-doge-to-work-with-auditors/article_9fae9dc4-f478-11ef-8d56-332511026662.html

LA Legislative Auditor says MCIP funds misspent by hospitals: https://www.nola.com/news/healthcare_hospitals/louisiana-health-department-failed-to-oversee-parts-of-state-medicaid-program-audit-says/article_c59da822-fdfb-11ef-8015-9f4118cb1f63.html

(3/26)Budget to LDH increasing $1.5B despite Landry's saving cuts. Surgeon General Abraham claims need to offer doctors more money to get them to accept Medicaid patients: https://lailluminator.com/2025/03/26/louisiana-medicaid-set-to-grow-under-landry-even-as-d-c-republicans-may-force-cuts/

(3/27) Elon Musk's DOGE website shows $55M in cuts to LDH: https://www.wwno.org/public-health/2025-03-27/doge-website-shows-55m-in-cuts-to-louisiana-department-of-health

Louisiana faces $10M loss for mental health and substance use disorders after federal cuts: https://www.nola.com/news/healthcare_hospitals/louisiana-federal-cuts-health/article_c5a6715f-0c56-4ee7-b36b-1a26be86ace3.html

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (15 children)

What do you mean stretched out across all employees?

Lcmc is a "nonprofit" for tax related purposes and the CEO's salary is $2.2M!

The two main hospital chains are oschner and LCMC.

As of a few years ago I remembered the oschner CEO salary being way smaller than lcmc's CEO.

I just double checked and it looks like they had a leadership change 2 years ago and now oschner's CEO makes even more than lcmc's at $3.2M!

https://bizneworleans.com/episode-118-warner-thomas-pete-november-talk-about-ochsners-big-leadership-change/

https://nonprofitlight.com/la/new-orleans/ochsner-health-system

Not only that, within oschner there are different CEOs across different campuses

https://news.ochsner.org/news-releases/ochsner-health-names-new-chief-executive-officer-of-ochsner-medical-center-west-bank-campus

https://news.ochsner.org/news-releases/david-callecod-named-ceo-of-ochsner-lsu-health

This is fucking insanity! It's very much a problem. People talking about Medicaid Cuts and more efficiency, but yeah let's have multiple CEOs for the same hospital within the same city.

The Louisiana department of health is blaming Medicaid being too expensive and unsustainable on patients being less healthy over recent years and requiring too much healthcare and doctors not wanting to take Medicaid patients because they get paid less.

Yet LCMC just got rid of several doctors who took Medicaid! Not a whole lot of logic there.

Is it really that people got less healthy over the last two years and required more care? Or is it that oschner changed leadership and tried to go for the corrupt model lcmc was already using and now it's breaking the system.

Hospital expenses are mainly going into the pockets of CEOs that shouldn't exist and this is being blamed on the doctors and patients.

We gotta make cuts, where do we start.

Hmm... Healthcare needs it's CEOs that's a given. No need to keep all those unnecessary doctors and patients around though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So Landry's proposed 2026 state cuts were supposed to be offset by a Federal budget increase.

So not really sure what that means in reality since Federal DOGE is now also slashing money already planned for 2025.

https://pimento-mori.ghost.io/louisiana-doge-secret-meetings-may-have-involved-plans-to-cut-medicaid-2/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not sure there's really a difference to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm not even in Wisconsin and I don't know who is pushing what argument right now, but I'm going to recommend that whichever option the evil billionaire in the federal government who is currently destroying the world and trying to bribe people in Wisconsin wants you to vote for, don't do that.

Do the opposite of that. Regardless of what you believe about how things would/should work during normal times. This is not normal and we need people to start understanding that.

It reminds me of one of the best pieces of advice I ever received. I had a friend who had grown up with probably the worst parenting you could imagine. She told me that since she had her son there are plenty of situations where she has no clue what to do or what the outcome will be. When that happens, she stops and thinks about what her mom would do in that situation, acknowledges it, and says ok, just don't do that, and you're already off to a good start.

In this case her mom is Elon. So whatever he is trying to get you to vote for, don't do that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The only social media I used was reddit and I eventually got shadow banned for trying to warn people about shit like this.

I've tried using bluesky and Mastodon but it never gets much if any traction. I share stuff online hoping people that use other forms of social media will share it too though, so please feel free to share it everywhere you can.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

No DeVos is the Amway family.

I had never heard of Vos before, but out of curiosity just looked at his Wikipedia page. I learned he made his money in the popcorn business (?) and apparently is notable in Wisconsin for his legislative role to weaken bargaining rights and labor unions in Wisconsin while Scott Walker was governor. Which also checks out with some typical SPN scumbag BS going way back:

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/04/state-policy-network-union-bargaining/

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59635227

Y'all come on now... If anyone in Louisiana is actually seeing this, there is no way y'all are ok with that right?

The main link is a comparison of both John Bell Edwards original declaration and Landry's most recent renewal from the 20th.

One obvious difference seems to be that Landry grants to the director of the Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) authority to take whatever action he deems appropriate in response to declaration of emergency.

https://www.theadvertiser.com/story/news/local/acadiana/2025/03/21/gov-landry-louisiana-omv-emergency-software-failure/82590867007/

Allegedly it has to do with the office of motor vehicles. Wouldn't be a big deal, except on literally the same day, he announced GOHSEP is now under control of the National Guard.

According to Landry "This move not only delivers significant cost savings but also aligns with my belief in the importance of relying more on our National Guard to strengthen our state's resilience."

According to this article https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-restructure-gohsep-under-louisiana-national-guard-fiscal-responsibility/article_7e9e08f2-ee67-463c-a2b3-424f6165a087.html

"GOHSEP Director Jacques Thibodeaux took on a challenging role and served our state with dedication under difficult circumstances. We deeply appreciate his service," Landry said in the announcement.

Thibodeaux said in an interview that, over the next 30 days, he will help transition GOHSEP from a stand-alone agency to one under the purview of the National Guard in a role titled special assistant to the adjutant general of the Louisiana National Guard.

His plans after that are currently undetermined, Thibodeaux said. He noted that he's worked in emergency management for 40 years and is also a retired army soldier and retired U.S. Marshal.

"I'm gonna take (a) well-needed break and enjoy my family, and then I'll determine what's gonna be the next chapter," he said.

So it seems like the director named in the order, no longer exists. If I'm just dumb and misunderstanding this please explain it to me.

 

Y'all come on now... If anyone in Louisiana is actually seeing this, there is no way y'all are ok with that right?

The main link is a comparison of both John Bell Edwards original declaration and Landry's most recent renewal from the 20th.

One obvious difference seems to be that Landry grants to the director of the Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) has authority to take whatever action he deems appropriate in response to declaration of emergency.

https://www.theadvertiser.com/story/news/local/acadiana/2025/03/21/gov-landry-louisiana-omv-emergency-software-failure/82590867007/

Allegedly it has to do with the office of motor vehicles. Wouldn't be a big deal, except on literally the same day, he announced GOHSEP is now under control of the National Guard.

According to Landry "This move not only delivers significant cost savings but also aligns with my belief in the importance of relying more on our National Guard to strengthen our state's resilience."

According to this article https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-restructure-gohsep-under-louisiana-national-guard-fiscal-responsibility/article_7e9e08f2-ee67-463c-a2b3-424f6165a087.html

"GOHSEP Director Jacques Thibodeaux took on a challenging role and served our state with dedication under difficult circumstances. We deeply appreciate his service," Landry said in the announcement.

Thibodeaux said in an interview that, over the next 30 days, he will help transition GOHSEP from a stand-alone agency to one under the purview of the National Guard in a role titled special assistant to the adjutant general of the Louisiana National Guard.

His plans after that are currently undetermined, Thibodeaux said. He noted that he's worked in emergency management for 40 years and is also a retired army soldier and retired U.S. Marshal.

"I'm gonna take (a) well-needed break and enjoy my family, and then I'll determine what's gonna be the next chapter," he said.

So it seems like the director named in the order, no longer exists. If I'm just dumb and misunderstanding this please explain it to me.

 

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/workforce/2025/03/homeland-security-makes-cuts-to-offices-overseeing-civil-rights-protections/

Only 2 of those 3 offices are involved in immigration. The 3rd is the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), which supports the Homeland Security's mission to secure the nation while preserving individual liberty, fairness, and equality under the law for all American citizens:

https://www.dhs.gov/office-civil-rights-and-civil-liberties

https://moskowitz.house.gov/posts/fema-independence-act-2025

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/congress/2025/03/lawmakers-introduce-bill-to-break-fema-out-of-dhs/?readmore=1

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5213057-noem-plans-eliminate-fema/

https://www.fema.gov/about/offices/civil-rights

This bill from a Florida Rep is proposing to liberate FEMA to allegedly free it from DHS red tape, but was introduced the same day DHS secretary said during a televised cabinet meeting she plans to eliminate FEMA from DHS. With FEMA eliminated, a 4th office of civil rights under FEMA is also eliminated.

If this bill succeeds, it means that FEMA no longer responds to an emergency situation as an agency. It will be under control of a single cabinet member who answers to the president.

This means that in an emergency, we also lose protection of the civil rights office within FEMA. The FEMA Office of Civil Rights is committed to the full enforcement of federal civil rights laws before, during, and after disasters.

Does that mean it's 100% effective at doing that? Hell no. It means it's a seatbelt that only works sometimes, but these people are arguing we might as well just cut the seatbelts out of a cars for being inefficient and only working sometimes.

I am in no way arguing that FEMA doesn't need some serious fixing, but please understand that if we lose protection of civil rights during a disaster, we lose any expectation of rights being upheld by the National Guard, which is now in full control over an emergency response in Louisiana.

https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-restructure-gohsep-under-louisiana-national-guard-fiscal-responsibility/article_7e9e08f2-ee67-463c-a2b3-424f6165a087.html

 

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/workforce/2025/03/homeland-security-makes-cuts-to-offices-overseeing-civil-rights-protections/

Only 2 of those 3 offices are involved in immigration. The 3rd is the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), which supports the Homeland Security's mission to secure the nation while preserving individual liberty, fairness, and equality under the law for all American citizens:

https://www.dhs.gov/office-civil-rights-and-civil-liberties

https://moskowitz.house.gov/posts/fema-independence-act-2025

https://federalnewsnetwork.com/congress/2025/03/lawmakers-introduce-bill-to-break-fema-out-of-dhs/?readmore=1

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5213057-noem-plans-eliminate-fema/

https://www.fema.gov/about/offices/civil-rights

This bill from a Florida Rep is proposing to liberate FEMA to allegedly free it from DHS red tape, but was introduced the same day DHS secretary said during a televised cabinet meeting she plans to eliminate FEMA from DHS. With FEMA eliminated, a 4th office of civil rights under FEMA is also eliminated.

If this bill succeeds, it means that FEMA no longer responds to an emergency situation as an agency. It will be under control of a single cabinet member who answers to the president.

This means that in an emergency, we also lose protection of the civil rights office within FEMA. The FEMA Office of Civil Rights is committed to the full enforcement of federal civil rights laws before, during, and after disasters.

Does that mean it's 100% effective at doing that? Hell no. It means it's a seatbelt that only works sometimes, but these people are arguing we might as well just cut the seatbelts out of a cars for being inefficient and only working sometimes.

I am in no way arguing that FEMA doesn't need some serious fixing, but please understand that if we lose protection of civil rights during a disaster, we lose any expectation of rights being upheld by the National Guard, which is now in full control over an emergency response in Louisiana.

https://www.nola.com/news/politics/jeff-landry-restructure-gohsep-under-louisiana-national-guard-fiscal-responsibility/article_7e9e08f2-ee67-463c-a2b3-424f6165a087.html

 

Hi, I posted about this yesterday, but people should be aware that the Department of Homeland Security is attempting to dismantle three civil rights offices for allegedly standing in the way of their immigration mission.

If that doesn't concern you on its own, you should know that the funny thing is, only two of the three civil rights offices are actually focused on immigration. The third is just general civil rights. So that means today it's this lady, tomorrow it's you or someone you care about.

You can read more about that here: https://pimento-mori.ghost.io/states-continue-to-push-law-and-policy-that-coincidentally-aids-federal-government-agenda/

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/27720691

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59525922

Hey Louisiana residents, don't know if you've heard about Landry's most recent cost saving efforts?

I'm sure I don't need to tell you why this would be very bad in any normal situation, but given some other things that are occurring at the federal level with Homeland Security's Office of Civil Rights, it's even worse than that.

So, I wrote a brief post with some information about why that is, and why all Americans should be concerned by these actions: https://pimento-mori.ghost.io/states-continue-to-push-law-and-policy-that-coincidentally-aids-federal-government-agenda/

 

Hey Louisiana residents, don't know if you've heard about Landry's most recent cost saving efforts?

I'm sure I don't need to tell you why this would be very bad in any normal situation, but given some other things that are occurring at the federal level with Homeland Security's Office of Civil Rights, it's even worse than that.

So, I wrote a brief post with some information about why that is, and why all Americans should be concerned by these actions: https://pimento-mori.ghost.io/states-continue-to-push-law-and-policy-that-coincidentally-aids-federal-government-agenda/

 

A place for discussing and sharing information and ideas about political psychology

 

These shared character traits stem from a cognitive and emotional developmental arrest in both childhood and adolescence resulting in fixed, life-long, concrete thinking patterns. They fail to attain the last stage of mental and emotional development, that of abstract thinking, which is necessary for critical reasoning that allows one to consider the broader significance of ideas and information rather than depend on concrete details and impulses alone. These autocratic leaders have limited capacity for empathy, love, guilt, or anxiety that become developmentally permanent and guide everyday decision making. Character or personality traits that perpetuate the lives of autocratic leaders are further distinguished by sociopathic and narcissistic behaviors that self-serve to cover their constant fear of insecurity and the insatiable need for power.

view more: ‹ prev next ›