1141kizzie

joined 2 months ago
[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe they like him & will die for him? Idk I am not from Russia, but your standard of good & bad is not universal

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like the philosophy but I also don't understand why anyone could pay for it. IG, It's like chess, only top players & teachers earn money from it.

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 months ago

Why it is even honorary? Jesus teachings are garbage

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
  1. Wild tales
  2. Black mirror

Funny, for me there are more items in Must read List than Must watch.

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you are talking about banning people in debate, Then you are not being fair. Any criticism can cause annoyance to some people, even if criticism have pleasant wording

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why they made this move? does not this give them super bad Reputation? they sent message to not speak against them, is silencing people that important? I am outsider, I don't follow USA politics so i fail to understand this.

[–] 1141kizzie@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 months ago

If you are doing injustice in small acts then you will also do injustice in big acts too, Especially if you think you can get away with it. And person's view & promise about this does not matter, Because as Schopenhauer put it,

supposing that we wanted to know, for instance, how someone will act in a position in which we intend to place him, we must not rely on his promises and assurances. For, even assuming that he spoke honestly, he speaks of a matter that he does not know. Therefore, we have to calculate his actions solely on the basis of weighing the circumstances that he will have to face and their conflict with his character.

But I think person can achieve this kind of purity, by trying to be pure everyday. The reason i believe this is because i read a ancient Indian text called Mahabharata and it talked about a asceticism, Brahman, ashramas, double celibacy(doing sex only to beget children), mahaprasthana(means great journey, when person determine to departs from home and wanders around, awaiting death). It also had stories of benevolent kings, warriors & people showing uprightness. So, l believe, some people have attainted this kind of purity already in history & it's proof that man can control their desires and take right actions with impartiality by observing Brahmacharya

So your question, if I can be benevolent dictator without being corrupt or not?, yes, I can be but this job is not best suitable for me because of my personality And currently, my time tracking statistics & recent actions are not showing good results.

view more: ‹ prev next ›