Who owns the copyright is irrelevant.
It is, which is why i focused on where the repository is located and whether that determines possession.
0x0
joined 2 years ago
Russia might invade Finland.
Finland's part or NATO now. Putin may be a lot of things, stupid ain't one of them. Ironically, this kinda backfired on him but can't say it was unexpected considering most scandinavians love the american dream.
The US is the most belligerent nation on earth, shall we ban american contributors? How about israeli?
Should their code be removed from the kernel?
The real question i haven't seen answered is Who owns the kernel code. Torvalds owns the Linux™ but that's to prevent others from buying it, but i was under the impression the source code is owned by all those who contribute to it and not whoever happens to be employing Torvalds at the time. Or is it a matter of where https://git.kernel.org/ happens to be hosted?
I'd suggest Codeberg but that's in Germany, so maybe another forgejo instance hosted maybe in Switzerland.
Hell, there’s even absolute dickholes which post their own definition of “open-source” like they’re the fucking OSI themselves: https://futo.org/open-source-definition/
They seem to be a bit incoherent... some AGPL, some MIT, then some inh-house licensing... weird.
Another major factor is that the EU AI Act provides special exemptions for "open source" models.
Aaah, that's why.
it can’t be indexed and can quickly disappear on a while on the admin side.
On a whim? Also, Google will be disabling it's caching feature soon.
connected to a hotspot
These tend to use SIM-cards too. IF you want to avoid triangulation don't even put a SIM card in at all.
How timely...
Which law under which jurisdiction?
Ah, yes, the ol' eXtra porn ThinkPad.
It may happen