this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
13 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22296 readers
95 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Social security failures coupled with structural gender inequality leave many people in Germany mired in poverty, especially single-parent families and older women.

Major gaps remain in the world’s third richest country between the amount of social security support received and the poverty risk threshold.

The parties in coalition talks should prioritize strengthening social security protections and addressing longstanding structural barriers to gender equality.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

The German government is legally obliged to ensure the human rights to social security and to an adequate standard of living contained in international treaties it has promised to uphold. Related treaties, standards, and guidance on social security, from UN and European human rights bodies, set out requirements for social security benefits to be adequate.

Germany’s Constitutional Court has developed jurisprudence on the minimum subsistence level required to live in dignity. This requires the state to ensure that people are left with at least enough of their earnings to cover their necessary living expenses, and to guarantee a minimum level of participation in social, cultural, and political life.

And here we see the gulf between legal requirements and implementation even in still-functioning democracies. It's still surreal that Germany is holding but the U.S. has failed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The parties in coalition talks should prioritize strengthening social security protections

If you expect any of that from those two party you haven't been paying attention.

While the SPD carries 'Socialist' in it's name they are responsible for some of the biggest cuts to social security during the 2000s. The CDU has been railing against 'Sozialschmarotzer' for years now and the 'Christian' C is only a fig leaf at this point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

CDU/CSU weren't even nominally Christian in the '90s. It was weird to live somewhere with a secular party with "Christian" in the name and then come home to the beginnings of christofascism under the veneer of secularism. Strange times we live in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Just one thing. The SPD doesn't carry socialist in its name, they are social democrats. Capitalists with a veneer of social responsibility (which they haven't taken serious in decades).