A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
Red herring. QDs are not a measure of display quality. These ones are:
Add power usage and price, and I couldn't care less about it being CRT, TFT, IPS, OLED, QLED, Laser, or hologram.
This is why I increasingly look at review sites I trust, especially for claims I can't easily verify myself. If it's not reviewed it doesn't exist.
Do you have some credible review sites you recommend?
Not OP, but rtings seems good to me. They're not afraid to mention when a new model is actually inferior to it's predecessor and they have standardized scoring for multiple product categories. Downside is limit of free reviews per month, but I've never needed more than they allow.
The free review count is also IP based, so for most countries that makes it a daily limit and you can just use a VPN to get around it entirely.
Thanks, will check them out.
Do be careful. I'm considering 700€ headphones because of them.
Their sortable category ratings are just awesome though. Have a big home? Go look at routers and sort by rating for multi-level home or large home.
I agree. That was one of the main sites I used to determine buying the Sony Bravia. Turns out they were spot on about everything. I'll use that site again I'm sure.
Sony and Philips are the top tier lately as far as I know. LG has been doing weird things and Samsung hasn't actually been good on the high-end for a long time. Or maybe it's coming back now with the QD-OLED displays? Because the original "QLED" absolutely felt like deceptive marketing, as "QLED" looks so similar to "OLED". Then there's the whole ads thing on Samsung. Idk if LG does this.
So chances are, you made a pretty good choice. Sony's a reliable company generally.
For monitors rtings and Monitors Unboxed. It's been a while, but I think TFTCentral also does/did good reviews.
Most PC hardware Gamers Nexus and Hardware Unboxed
Notebooks: notebookcheck
USB chargers & powerbanks: AllThingsOnePlace
Those are it mostly
Edited for readability
Thank you, i will take a look next time i buy some things.
I second RTings. A lot of AV forums do some pretty in depth reviews. HDTVTest on YouTube is also very thorough as well.
That’s fine, OLEDs are better anyway.
Depends on viewing conditions. As of yet there isn't an objectively superior display technology.
OLEDs have the best contrast in a dark room as black pixels can be fully turned off, but they are generally less bright and use more power than comparable LCD TVs or monitors (especially when you compare models of a similar price range).
LCD based monitors and TVs can get brighter and can actually achieve a higher contrast in a well lit room as the black pixels on an LCD are less reflective than black pixels on an OLED, and when viewing in daylight the ambient light is more than enough to drown out the backlight bleed.
There are also other smaller pros and cons. OLED for example has a better pixel response time, while IPS LCDs are more colour accurate. Text rendering and other fine graphics also generally look slightly sharper on an LCD than on an OLED display (when comparing displays of equal resolution / pixel density) due to the subpixel layout.
Can confirm my oled is gorgeous in a dark environment but doesn't deal well at all during daytime with dark content (bright content is generally fine though).
Don't they use quantum dots in some OLEDs? Isn't that what QD-OLED is?
Technically, but when any marketing refers to Q anything in TVs, they’re talking about LCD Panels. Samsung manufactures QD-OLED panels but they don’t compete with anything else in the market that has “Q” in the naming schema.
Yes. I'm assuming they mean W-OLED (the other kind of OLED) when they say OLED. Or else they meant to say uLED.