this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

Severance

545 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The completion of Cold Harbor is hyped up so much throughout this series. Jame Eagan  tells Helly AND Helena about it excitedly, Drummond describes it as “Lumon’s greatest day”, and Lumon fired three good workers in favor of three known dissidents because they knew Mark wouldn’t complete Cold Harbor without it.

So when Gemma walks into a room and disassembles a crib, many viewers were either perplexed or in disagreement. How could this be the crowning moment? How could it be so banal?


Theories on the purpose of cold harbor fall into two camps:

It’s testing compliance

ColdHarbour Gemma is different from every innie we’ve seen on the show. In mark’s first moments, he threatened to find and kill Petey. Helly assaulted mark and tried to run away. Even Gemma’s other innies show reservations, like when she’s distressed on the plane or reluctant at the dentist or hateful in the Christmas card room. 

CH Gemma is different. She’s given the same onboarding question and standard memory wipe as Mark & Helly, but instead of acting out, she complies instantly with the task she’s given. 

Kier sought to tame the four tempers to create maximum efficiency, and in CH Gemma, that’s worked perfectly: she has no objections to any prompting whatsoever. Cold Harbor could be about trying to create the perfect employee.

It’s testing severance bounds

We know Cobel was obsessed with reintegration and putting iMark & Mrs. Casey together. She loots Mark’s house for his wife’s things to prod iMark during the wellness sessions, and watches closely as iMark sculpts a tree in front of Mrs. Casey.

We know at least some of the rooms were personalized to Gemma’s anxieties and dislikes; Allentown forces her to write thank-you cards repeatedly because she hates doing that. In the same way, Cold Harbour is personalized to her greatest pain: losing the baby with Mark.

Cold Harbor could be about pushing the bounds of severance; Dr. Mauer says so himself. There is no emotion bleeding through here; CH Gemma tackles one of the lowest moments of her life completely docile and oblivious.

(As an aside, if this was the intention, mark “passed” this test when Gemma did not. iMark abandons his outie’s wife after his outie experienced the most resplendent joy in years, proving love can’t transcend severance.)


What do you think of Cold Harbor? What was it trying to achieve? Was it the best way to achieve either purpose?

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TL;DR: I think the design of the room, combined with the activity in it based on previous experience is exactly what you'd expect Cold Harbor to be. It is the ultimate test to see if the barriers are holding after taming the tempers.

I think you're right on the money - I just have a slight point to add. Remember how Mark bought this crib at some point. He had something to prove when he said that he was pretty handy. Back then, it was sort of funny to Gemma as she dismissed his statement by calling him 'handsy'.

When Gemma had her miscarriage and Mark started actually building the thing, failing miserably, it was very painful for Gemma.

So when Jame keeps asking if the barriers are holding, he wants to know if the tempers are tamed enough to not even have the most painful moments awaken something in this Cold Harbor Gemma. Considering the bad situations we've seen, where the barriers did hold (dentist, thank-you note writing), this one is much more emotional, much deeper rooted than the others.

They take the single most excruciating moment of her life, find some reference to it that is not too overt, and see if it generates any kind of reaction. When it doesn't, and she complies, even without questioning a why, Jame knows he's created a severance barrier so strong, it's pretty much perfect.

What I'm getting from the final episode is that they have a rudimentary severance process in place. Let's call it the Mark One (ha). Now Gemma is sort of like a test subject for a better severance, which will not only make the innie more compliant, but it will also make it possible to create new innies for any situation an outie does not want to experience.

The most important pro of this: Your innie will not have a complete life, i.e. their social interactions will be limited, therefore they will not develop any kind of social intelligence. This creates a situation wherein the innie will feel like they have no choice to accept their hellish life. Remember: for an innie, there is no time between activation and deactivation. They are continuously going to the dentist. But as there is no possibility to discuss this with others who have a shared experience, there is no option of questioning, no road to rebel.

The first iteration of Cold Harbor illustrates this perfectly. Gemma's tempers have been tamed enough for her to accept her situation and be compliant. The emptiness of that innie Gemma's life (the pristine white room with just a crib in it) is designed for nothing to alter her situation, and thus, her tempers, to make her less compliant over time.

It leads one to wonder if what the Eagans are doing is not, in basis, a good thing. They will create the perfect life for their constituents: no pain, no sadness, for any situation you don't want to experience, you will just create an innie and you'll have no memory of the ordeal. Like the senator's wife in childbirth. Of course the question is whether this is ethical, it negates any right the innies might have as pilots of the outies vessel. And of course, the balance between good things and bad things are what makes us human, that's a fact of life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Outie Mark wasn't building the crib, he was dismantling it after the miscarriage. I'd argue that this action is more traumatizing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Oh I figured he was trying to assemble it but couldn't get it there. Yours makes more sense.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They are continuously going to the dentist. But as there is no possibility to discuss this with others who have a shared experience, there is no option of questioning, no road to rebel.

I think there is something key here that Jame Eagan only truly realized during his "Oh Fuck" moment. Jame Eagan & Lumon are wrong.

Sure Gemma had a dentist innie, but that innie, while compliant, knew that pain was coming and wanted to resist. An innie that only exists for an hour every six weeks might not rebel, yet.

But Gemma also had a greeting card innie. Again, compliant, but she isn't actually performing her task. Maybe it's because her hand hurt, but she isn't actually fully compliant. She is rebelling, even if it's limited.

Then we have Cold Harbor. Keep in mind that Lumon is so confident in Cold Harbor, that Drummond is comfortable killing Mark before we even know the test results. Drummond makes no attempt to spare Mark. Mark is a cog, he may be a special cog, but still a cog. Gemma is a cog, a special cog, but still a cog. Jame & Lumon believe they have development a methodology that can be handed to cogs and develop a form of Severance that tames the four tempers.

But what happens? Gemma almost immediately rebels. It takes a moment and it may be because of Mark and her have a special relationship, but she does. Cold Harbor is a failure. Unbeknownst to Jame, the previous tests were also failures. The cult that is Kier wants to believe it works, but wanting something to work and something actually working are two different things.

But why did it fail? Because Jame & Lumon don't actually understand Severance. Cobel does, but she was sidelined. Not just sidelined during the series like we saw. Cobel was clearly sidelined years ago. I think the wellness sessions are created by Cobel trying but ultimately failing to continue her work. I think the success leads to Jame taking special interest and ultimately overriding Cobel. I think Cobel was actually successful at her job, but Jame just took it and twisted it further. He could have had what he wanted, if he had just left it alone.

I suspect part of Season 3 will focus on the Jame Eagan and Cobel backstory. I suspect Reghabi also worked closely with Cobel, but got out or possibly was kicked out. Maybe a loyal Cobel ratted on her.

But Jame Eagan and his "Oh Fuck" is that everything he's worked on was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

I'm definitely in the 2nd camp. They were trying to prove the effectiveness of the segmentation of the brain.

I also think being able to prove that the 25th segmentation of Gemma's brain can still split off solidly enough to overcome that individual's most painful moment says something beyond iMark.

Being able to prove that the chip can provide 25 different "personalities" could be useful in many contexts, and the potential marketing for Lumon would be strong.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was the perfect test, testing the limits of being severed.

My questions: Why wasn't Mark turned into an Innie when going into CH? Technology upgrade for Gemma?

Is Gemma the only one being tested? If iMark is working on Gemma, what are the other innies working on?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Could the other refiners just not be working on anything? They might be props for Mark. Lumon knows that hoomans apparently need hooman interaction, their work output suffers when they feel lonely and for now (in this current version of severance) they haven't found a more cost-effective solution to this embarrassment. So maybe the other refiners are given truly meaningless tasks that just imitate what Mark is doing just so that Mark feels comfortable enough in his simulated normal work environment to finish his important work. This icky hooman stuff is all supposed to go away with the next version of severance.

I'm going to say it: the other refiners are working on goats.

Before Mark started working on Gemma, this may have been different. There were probably several earlier iterations of this project that ran simultaneously. Petey, Dylan and Irving used to work on real people. Mark working on Gemma just proved so successful that every other test was abandoned and the other refiners were reluctantly retained, for the reason above.

Or, of course, there's always the possibility of more people like Gemma trapped somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could the other refiners just not be working on anything? They might be props for Mark.

I'm not sure about this, in season 1 management are anxious about Helly completing her file on time.

Maybe they're all given the same inputs, but they need several refiners to validate Marks work?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

You're right, I forgot about that. Hm. Back to the drawing board then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

My theory is that Gemma’s being exposed to “generalized” unpleasantries (dentist, airplane) and “specified” unpleasantries (thank-you cards, the crib). We see Helly working on Siena, and Siena is one of the rooms on Gemma’s testing floor, so we know Gemma’s been in a non-Mark refined room.

If there are other test subjects, maybe it’s useful to have a good collection of “general” worries that they can use on everybody.