this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1479 readers
104 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

This became obvious with the launch of Nvidia's Blackwell accelerators a year ago. The chips boasted 5x the performance uplift over Hopper, which sounded great until you realized it needed twice the die count, a new 4-bit datatype, and 500 watts more power to do it.

The reality was, normalized to FP16, Nvidia's top-specced Blackwell dies are only about 1.25x faster than a GH100 at 1,250 dense teraFLOPS versus 989 — there just happened to be two of them.

Sounds like Nvidia is trying to pull a Multi Frame Generation style misleading promo tactic with enterprise GPUs too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Jesus Christ 600kW of power needed per rack. Most normal datacenters are still at something like 20 - 40 kW.