this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22612 readers
4363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On Thursday, US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., announced drastic job cuts and the destruction of large sections of public health infrastructure, as part of Trump’s unprecedented assault on federal employees and government services.

(Last post here for today, don’t want to clog feeds)

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

I hope these assholes catch a preventable disease and die a slow, debilitating, and agonizing death.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Is this the other side of the war on drugs coin?

‘Cause this coin sucks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They claim 10k jobs, of which most are early retirement buy-outs, will save 1.8 billion dollars? So the average employee costs them 180k. I mean, I know Kennedy didn't take a biology 101 course, but this is just stupid for a 4th grader with a piece of paper to do long multiplication. Their salaries are public information, and 180k is not even close (80k off) to the average.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I work in the public sector and part of my work sometimes involves budgeting for personnel. When an agency is accounting for the cost of their employees, they include all direct and indirect expenses. So, obviously salary, health coverage, various types of leave, pension - these are all direct costs. We also calculate agency indirects in some proportion - the marginal cost of having more payroll staff, HR staff, IT support, facilities, etc., to cover the additional employee.

I wouldn't be surprised for the total cost to an agency being about 40-60% higher than salary cost. The rate reported here is high and could be very well padded, but it's not entirely out there to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I also factor that in, but in cushy government, the benefits are usually in the 25k range. It doesn't scale endlessly with pay. Fed wouldn't be on the extreme end of that, in my experience, it gets larger the lower the agency. Could just be my state taking care of employees well though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

And I'm sure they have a "mandate" for this.