this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22568 readers
4204 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Billionaire Elon Musk said he plans to hold a rally in Wisconsin to “personally hand over” $2 million to a pair of voters who have already cast their ballots in the state’s hotly contested Supreme Court race, despite a state law that prohibits giving anything of value in exchange for voting.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 99 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This is a big fat finger in the face of democracy and law and order. And nobody is doing anything about it.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago

Well, there's certainly some rallies. I've attended a couple, but we're certainly getting low on polite options.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Everyone knows what's left to do after nobody does anything. Yet nobody is doing that either.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This certainly seems like he could be arrested and face state chargers for election interference here. Wisconsin, get your shit together.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Definitely not if he's successful, and probably not if he's unsuccessful, if we're being honest.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 days ago

Yeah, he already did this in the general, no one gave a shit.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Wisconsin, get armed and angry.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Lock him up.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

How this is legal? In the past when a private citizen would go up to a politician and hand him a bag of money for some favor, we called that bribery/corruption and both would go to jail. Now a billionaire gives a personal contribution of 300 million to a politician in exchange for a high government position, and no one lifts a finger.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago

we called that lobbying I think

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Looks like a job for: a well regulated Militia necessary to the security of a free state.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago

Wisconsin, do the right thing and arrest this guy.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well guys, we know where he will be…………….

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

Haha wow this would probably be super dangerous if he did it in a country with one of the most lax firearms laws in the world and where the ratio of firearms:population is notably greater than 1

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago

For reference, here is the pertinent section of the Wisconsin Bribery statute (taken from this PoliticsUSA.com post)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

So 2 Wisconsinites have the chance to do the funniest thing of all time?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm still outraged by 2,000 mules here /s - but this is just straight election interference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Is this a surprise?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Not the most efficient way to rally two (2) votes.