this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
15 points (72.7% liked)

politics

22634 readers
3682 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Excerpt:


For a moment, it seemed like anything was possible. With Donald Trump’s popular-vote victory in November, the old order had been dealt a devastating blow. Democrats were mostly despondent. The resistance had petered out. Where to go from here? No one really knew.

Many observers of American politics, me included, thought that a new era had begun — one of Trumpian hegemony. Republicans, emboldened, would reshape American culture, ushering in a period of conservative dominance for years, if not decades. This was the “vibe.” In theory, cutting waste and making the federal government more accountable was popular. For a majority of Americans, progressive policies on issues such as immigration and transgender rights had run their course.

Trump was riding a wave of exhaustion with Democrats’ cultural overreach. After he won the presidency for the second time, centrist and even left-leaning friends would suggest on encrypted group chats that some good might come out of this after all. I’d meet people at parties, reading groups and “salons” who would whisper — or, when intoxicated, shout — that they could finally say what they really thought on issues such as gender identity and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives without fear of being ostracized.

All of this was hard to measure. What is a vibe after all? As John Ganz writes, a vibe shift is a shift “to mood itself, that is to say, something felt but not fully articulated or articulable.” It’s more than a feeling but it’s still just that — a feeling. And feelings aren’t facts. Or, if they are facts, they’re not necessarily durable.

I was wrong to think that this — whatever this was — would be more lasting. It wasn’t. It turns out the moment of Trumpian dominance was just that: a moment. Something has shifted again. We are now in another phase: the vibe shift away from the vibe shift. The way we experience time has altered, as well. Through his flurry of executive orders and nonstop assaults on American institutions, Trump has compressed time. What would have taken months to play out now takes weeks, sometimes even days.

Some wear and tear is beginning to show up in surveys, with Trump’s approval ratings on a downward trend. For the first time in NBC News’s national polling, a majority disapproves of Trump’s handling of the economy, a striking reversal for a president who has traditionally received high marks on economic issues. The stock market has plummeted, inflation has ticked up, and Republicans increasingly face angry constituents at town hall events. Institutional opposition has grown as well, with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., a conservative, issuing a rare public rebuke after Trump called for a federal judge’s impeachment.

Trump is squandering what might have been a once-in-a-generation realignment. Already, the moment has begun fragmenting into something else, something not yet defined but unmistakably different. This is the paradox of our political moment: permanence announces itself only to dissolve almost immediately.


top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

What a huge amount of words to say so little: The feeling is changing based on a few polls that are trending down.

Ok, I disagree. The polls are settling, bottoming out, in a place much higher than they should be. Trump is shock-and-awing successfully. People are disoriented, but the Overton window is shifting very quickly.

And the game isn't "vibe" or approval. The game is authoritarian takeover. And that game is effectively over. Yes, they stopped following the rules but as we argue about those rules, they're collecting all the pieces, and putting them away in the box. They. No. Longer. Care. About. Polls.

All this to say, this copium isn't even high-grade product, it's too heavily cut with delusion.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

This person is lamenting that the Nazis in power might be getting some pushback. This person is a Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Trump was riding a wave of exhaustion with Democrats’ cultural overreach.

I’d meet people at parties, reading groups and “salons” who would whisper — or, when intoxicated, shout — that they could finally say what they really thought on issues such as gender identity and diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives without fear of being ostracized.

The Washington Post can eat shit and so can Bezos for peddling this kind of slop.

The idea that these fucking assholes ever shut up about their backwards fucking opinions is a joke.

The people supporting progressive ideals have always been the ones shouted down and being told they are being divisive.

"They can finally say" my ass they never, ever shut the fuck up about how they feel. They just feel emboldened to be a legitimate fucking all-out asshole now is all.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

weaponized hypocrisy