this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Mozilla Controversy Exposed

117 readers
2 users here now

Scandalzilla is a community created to show people the history of Mozilla and to talk about controversial decisions they made.


Community Rules

  • Stay on the topic or considering opening your own thread.
  • No trolling, keep emotional outbursts to yourself.
  • Absolute no hate allowed. Discuss things on a civil manner or let it go.
  • Fanboys and disrespectful people are not welcome. Accept opinions and history how it was and not how you want to see it.
  • Claims must be backed up with evidence or minimum some references.
  • Good faith questions are allowed.
  • No conspiracy theories, this includes baseless accusations.
  • Do not suggest or undermine this community by suggesting other products, this is not the purpose of this community, we only point out problems with Mozilla or ask questions, nothing more.
  • Do not abuse the report function if you disagree in something. Abusing the report function results in ban.
  • Consider to ignore specific user(s) or block this entire community in your Lemmy Settings if you entirely disagree.

Reference


If I find a better logo I add one. Not really happy with the current one. Suggestions are welcome.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Another fork that will die within 5 years, why they not adopt it into directly into normal browser is beyond me. Not much users use VR on a daily system anyway to experience the web trough it. That is maybe 1 percent of their entire user base.

Merge the code, reduce the clutter from this version and make it accessible trough the actual stable ring, so you do not need to depend on another project and everyone can decide to use and enable it or not.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here