this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
772 points (98.5% liked)

News

36018 readers
2034 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 250 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Reminder that Wells Fargo was caught opening millions of accounts without permission. This company should not be trusted with anything.

One of the rare cases where a company actually paid a huge $3 billion settlement.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 62 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It hardly made a dent, though.

Link

[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Totally. It wasn’t close to being enough. The entire board should have been arrested for fraud, at the very least. At least it wasn’t some laughably low amount like we’re used to, I’m surprised it was even this high.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I really wish we'd start prosecuting and imprisoning leadership boards for really anything the company does wrong. It's really amazing the way we let companies just get away with every single thing, I mean how much more predictable could the slide to shittiness be?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is exactly why fees would be revenue based. A flat 1% of annual revenue per offense would very quickly get that shit to stop.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was looking for this comment. ALL fines should run as a percentage of annual income or profits. This includes traffic tickets and other fines.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zewm@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Just an operating cost.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (2 children)

3B is peanuts to them. I want to see fines that cripple a company's yearly profits so that, in lieu of criminal investigations and repercussions, the execs at the very least get punished by their board of directors and shareholders. There's only one language they understand. Another poster called it "operating costs". That's what we need to get rid of; punitive fines need to regain their punitive nature in order to be anywhere close to effective.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Needs executive jail time of 1 year per million dollars too.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If a corporation is effectively a 'person' under the law, any corp that has caused death should receive the death penalty, and their executives executed by firing squad.

Also, as a legal entity as that of personhood, are corps even allowed to identify as anything under new anti dei 'laws'?

I don't know Wells Fargo's gender. That's illegal now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BertramDitore@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

No doubt. If fines and settlements are all we can muster, then there needs to be real personal consequences for those responsible as well as the corporation taking responsibility. Until we fully decouple money and politics, I have a hard time imagining that kind of proportionate punishment ever being doled out.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yep if there was any justice in the world this would have put Wells Fargo deep in the ground but fucking no

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b3an@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is true. At the time it sounded so serious. Hand slaps and finger wags. It’s totally ok to cheat steal and lie if you are rich. Rules don’t apply to you. It’s completely mad.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hark@lemmy.world 111 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We should do an uno reverse and nationalize wells fargo.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They should have been nationalized in 2009 instead of receiving $25 billion bailout loan.

[–] silicon@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Musk would just learn from them and open a bunch of bank accounts for everyone in the USA and have him control them all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drool@lemmy.catsp.it 68 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For anyone thinking it. I can confirm it feels great to close your wf account.

[–] zewm@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I closed mine when they were still called Wachovia 🤗

[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What? Wells Fargo was founded in 1852.

[–] DrFunkenstein@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Wachovia was a smaller bank that got bought out by Wells Fargo, iirc it was during the 2008 recession

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 59 points 11 months ago

Seriously FUCK these guys who think everything should be run like a business

[–] griff@lemmings.world 46 points 11 months ago (2 children)

People, shall we plot to eliminate Wells Fargo as a banking entity? Sign up for a local credit union instead, perchance?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 44 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This sounds like a scheme hatched in 1887.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] imsufferableninja@sh.itjust.works 36 points 11 months ago (24 children)

They don't need to privatize the USPS, they just need to lobby for the government's monopoly on post, established by act of Congress in the 1800s, to be removed. Then they can create a competing postal system, like Lysander Spooner did with the American Letter Mail Company. If they really think they can make a profitable service that competes with the USPS, let them try.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] bambam@piefed.social 26 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Democrats need to inject FUD into all privatization efforts, by saying they will investigate and reverse it if it happens.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Any entity that participated in privatization volunteers to be socialized.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'd like to privatize Wells Fargo, where I also mean "dismantle and leave behind an unrecognizable corpse"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Guess who'll be affected the most?

HintIt won't be the (mostly) urban leftists.


load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wells Fargo are thieves who steal from their customers. If you use them, you're about 15 years delayed in getting out. Security issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

Who more qualified than a company that is banned from doing business in some parts of the US due to being caught defrauding customers?

Meanwhile, in developed countries, post offices offer banking services.

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

It's gone so well for us in the UK, I can't imagine the entire organisation being asset stripped and then held for random at the taxpayer's expense.

[–] AmbientDread@midwest.social 7 points 11 months ago

Decades of bilking the elderly with unneeded services, imagine the fees they could charge for a real need. Ching Ching Ching

load more comments
view more: next ›