this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
359 points (96.6% liked)

Asklemmy

47150 readers
455 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not really. If you focus purely on just searching, yeah DDG is decent. But, I find its maps inferior and trying to find answers to some questions can get tedious. DDG I guess is just for people who want guilt-free searching.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ddg maps is just a no-frills apple maps.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. Even if it were identical to Google maps in terms of content, it runs slower on all platforms I’ve so far tried (windows, iOS, OSX).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I’ve been using DDG exclusively for something like 8 years. It works great for regular text search and I use bing for image searches. I really don’t understand the reluctance of people to switch to it. To me, Google has been borderline unusable garbage for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Cherry on the shit sundae was a couple months ago when Google started to require JavaScript be enabled for search.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay, so this wasn't just me! I installed NoScript for Chrome on my work laptop as a stop gap for no more ublock origin and thought something was fishy w/ Google's search page.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"just as good"? No, I feel it is (and has been for years) vastly superior but I mostly use it to find documentation or Stack Overflow answers so consistent UI and concise summaries are high priority to me. Take that as you will

I don't think anybody can dethrone Google Maps yet but that's another story

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

My thought always was that DDG was good to set as my default, and if I'm not happy with the results then it's not a big deal to use Google once in awhile.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

ive been using it consistently for the past few years. it works well for me, but sometimes ill go to other engines just to see what they come up with, or when results are lacking. sometimes they are better, sometimes they are worse.

meaning ddg is probably good enough nowadays, at least for me.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You probably already know this, but you can use search "bangs" to search other websites from ddg.

For example, to search google, you would put !g or !google at the start of your search.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo mostly uses Bing for its search results. It also uses yahoo, yandex, and it's own crawler, but for the most part you're getting Bing.

So what you really want to know is if Bing is just as good as Google. If you think it is, you should definitely use ddg because they're the least intrusive.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's much better than Bing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

...........Oh, sorry.

Hell no. If anything, it's gotten worse.

In their defense, however, it's probably largely not their fault. In my admittedly one-person-sample-size experience, 90% of the searchable Web is either Reddit threads or articles, and with Reddit going officially with Google (meaning DDG doesn't catch as many Reddit threads as they used to), that leaves most of the searchable Web being articles. Because SEO has to ruin everything.

So, it's not really that DDG is shitty (mostly), but that all searches are shitty. Though, with the whole Google-and-Reddit thing, I find Google's results are noticeably less shitty (though still shitty).

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

i switched from DDG to ecosia because of Lemmy and i gotta say it's even better

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

DDG does the job. Hopefully, I won't have to switch engines soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

isn't it just a bing wrapper?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No and kinda yes. Duckduckgo has its own webcrawler, but also adds in results from other sources including Bing, Yahoo and others.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Last time I checked, it matched Bing results exactly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

I just realized the other day that I haven't typed !g in months.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

DuckDuckGo AKA Bing is complete dog doo. When you are looking for news it only tries to shove in the Microsoft MSN news page. The algorithm manipulation in favor of Western MSM bias is even heavier than Google. When you search certain terms it refuses to show articles containing those exact terms.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah saying "DDG is as good as Google" means saying that DDG is worthless garbage lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't you mean DuckDuckBing ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago

I've been using DDG since 2016 and never felt it was worse in terms of "search quality" than Google.

Especially nowadays I hear friends whine near weekly about Google, but it's still somehow "better than DDG".

Honestly people just make excuses not to change what they're use to. Even if what they're used to has changed around them for the worse.

My only real complain I have is I wish 'search by date range' was less finicky use and also worked in the image tab like it does in Google images.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

You seriously can't type whatever dae means?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

DAE is a fairly common acronym on online forums, often used in titles such as these. You could have used Google (or DuckDuckGo) to learn its meaning 😊

It's simply "does anyone else."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Never saw that abbreviation before, but my assumption is it's "does anyone else" since I can't think of anything else that'd make sense in this context

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

I’ve been online for almost thirty years and have never - knowingly - seen β€œdae” as an abbreviation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Google is mostly adverts. Wouldn’t take much to be better than that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

I really tried, I set duckduckgo as the default for my second browser (I use it a lot) to slowly get used to it, but every time results are so bad I get mad and switch to Google especially for images

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

It’s just as good as 2008 google, which is all I want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I can turn off the horseshit firehose that we call AI, making it far better than google

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

100%. I have not used google in about roughly 15 years. DDG has been my daily driver since 2010

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I find it's actually better at this point because it just gives results without AI summaries and ads, also I find it's just straight up better at actually finding what you're looking for

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I've had to use !g way too much lately, so no.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

So far its still less bloated

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Eyeing the replies, does not one other person here get results constantly flooded with content farms? They've gotten significantly worse

But then, I don't use Google so maybe this is still better than Google Search?

It started maybe three years ago, around the same time as LLMs became usable for this, but I'm pretty sure >50% are human-written still. Probably the LLM generates the structure (saves any time they'd have to spend coming up with plausible-sounding texts) and someone from a low-income country is contracted to make it look more legit

Of course, queries for topics that have a Wikipedia page get Wikipedia first, recipes get tons of big-name recipe sites, products get stores. But when there's no obvious market around a topic, 3~4 out of 5 results are content farms pretending to have useful information to show unwary visitors ads

(As an alternative, I still have to try Kagi properly. It seemed on par with DDG when I did a few searches last year, but then their payment processor refused me trying to load my account, support was unhelpful, and I've gotten sidetracked since)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, I switched back in 2023 and noticed it was already better than google.

All major search engines feel like they're either filled with AI slop results, or just only returning major corporations' sites anymore, though. DDG just falls into the latter, while Google is mostly the former.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I do not think so in my experience. I'm a software developer and a lot of my job is searching solutions to problems. Every year or two I'll try DDG because I love the concept but it never works as well for me. Putting the same search query into Google yeilds actual results for me more often than DDG does.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I found Qwant to be a bit better, but yeah. Google got so much worse over last few years

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

Good enough for me, although there are times I need to use google.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I really agree Google just took themself out of the market. I wouldn't be surprised if they dropped their "search" product completely, the way they've dropped a lot of other good products along the way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

No. DDG still puts less priority in small blogs over Reddit posts. All bigger search engines put way too much stock & rank in corpo social media.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

DDG sold out, very focused "bubble" results that they initally railed against.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

As a general purpose search engine yeah it's just as good. Google has some nice extra features which aren't too important (for example if you search UFC it shows full fight card info and results on the search page).

Where it falls behind is for more "power user " type work. I only use Google at work as it makes finding very specific results with keywords and date ranges on certain sites etc much easier.

Nowadays I use Qwant though to boycott us. It's much slower but still does the job for day to day use.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

I switched to it a couple of years ago, with the expectation that I had to resort to google in more complex search instances. But very soon I found out that ddg did the job, and my "alternative" google searches did not turn up anything better, quite the contrary in fact, and I haven't been back since.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Have been using it for 8 years now. I never felt the need to switch back honestly. Only Google thing I really love is Maps and that's it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί