this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
31 points (94.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

16441 readers
215 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (9 children)

You can still have trees and plant life in low density housing. You don’t need green deserts everywhere.

[–] ladam@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah fuck lawns too, they aren’t meant to exist

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We can thank England for those damn things.

[–] activ8r@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

We used to be a great nation... Invading... Murdering... Stealing... Imposing grass deserts... Now we have left the EU, are implementing government spyware and have no plans to make anything better...

I don't remember what my point was, but England is shit and I don't want to be here anymore.

[–] Tropic420@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But you still need way more infrastructure for the Houses.

[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yup, tons more parking and tons more road space per capita as well. Low-density sprawl just needs a lot more stuff per capita.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

They should pay a significant land tax instead of leeching off the high-density dwellers.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

Noise. Neighbours being closer.

[–] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Uh yes, the suburban tranquility of non-stop leaf blowing, lawn mowing, and pickup humming.

Musics to my ears.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

It'd take it over the sound of the upstairs neighbor fucking his microwave while bowling at the same time

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This isn't a particularly convincing analogy. Islands have limited space. The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks. Meanwhile, our school district is already overwhelmed with children, so converting commercial spaces into apartments will merely add to congestion and sprawl. NIMBY's make a convincing argument against denser residential construction.

A better focus would be the ability to simplify public transit and walkability. Town centers and public spaces could be more accessible with denser residential construction, and the additional green space can be closer to where you live without everyone needing their own half-acre yard to mow and water.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AKADAP@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I spent seven years living in an apartment. I so enjoyed hearing the neighbors having sex, the thumping music they played, the smell of their cigarette smoke inside my apartment with all my windows closed, the random intrusions by management to repair something unrelated to my apartment, the random rent increases. Add this to the fact that I had no space for a work shop to make anything, and paying the equivalent of a mortgage with no equivalent home equity. Some people love apartment life, but it definitely was not for me.

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

the problem seems to be when people take "apartment life isn't for me" and then go to the conclusion of "they shouldn't build apartments for anybody"

you don't have to live in one. just let people build them. only allowing single family homes doesn't make single family homes more accessible for anybody, it just makes land more scarce and housing less affordable all around.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This meme is advocating it as the only option

[–] kier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Of course. Everyone can live in an apartment if they wish. I will be the one with the house at a reasonable distance.

You hate shitty apartments, not apartments.

[–] Skates@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The US has about 10 million square kilometers

That's 10 million x 1 million square meters (10^13 )

There will soon be (source: people like sex) 10 billion people on earth (10^10 )

This would give you 10^13 / 10^10 = 10^3 square meters (10700 square feet) of land for everyone on earth to live on. EVERY SINGLE PERSON. Not families, individual fucking people.

All of them contained within the US.

10700 square feet to build a house, have a small garden etc. Okay, not a lot. But that's one country that could house everyone. An extreme example of course - you're not gonna be able to use all that land, some of it is uninhabitable (red states lol). But just imagine it for a second, everyone living in one country would still be comfortable. And look how much is left of the rest of the world.

1000 square meters isn't enough space? Make your house have 4 stories, who gives a shit, make your own wizard tower. In a relationship? That's 21400 square feet for the couple. Have a couple of kids? 42800 square feet. That's a decent enough house+yard for 4 people, especially if you add one or two floors.

The problem is not that there isn't enough space. The problem is that some motherfuckers want and get more than their share of square feet. And then they charge you money to live in their share of land without owning it.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Name one good reason the average apartment experience could ever be better than living in a house.

People live in apartments to afford shelter, you'd be hard-pressed to find one that actually likes it better.

Sure you can make arguments about the concept of centralized feeling being better for nature, but no one actually wants to do it.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a student, I would rather rent in a modern apartment building than a house. No yard to take care of, closer to other stuff (grocery store is literally across the street), safer, no insects. I would 100% rather have a nice apartment over a meh house.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd choose a nice apartment over a nice house too. My dream is a nice two story apartment with big windows for lots of light and an open plan living space.

[–] Player2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

I've been living in a small one bedroom apartment in a modern 16 floor building for a bit over a year now. The only time I hear my neighbors is when they're taking their dogs out for walking, you can hear them in the hallway. The hot water pressure is better than any house I've lived in in the past. I have a beautiful view outside and my own balcony. These are just some complaints about apartments I've heard from other people.

The reason I compared a nice apartment to a meh house was to be closer in cost, but I agree and would also prefer a nice apartment over a nice house.

[–] El_Azulito@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, considering I can hear my neighbor through the wall right now, it’s hard to agree with this use of space.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good isolation is a thing. We've apartments where you could scream and you wouldn't hear it at your neighbour's.

[–] beemikeoak@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 6 months ago

Lies, compare:

To guadalajara:

Mexico

NewYork

LA

Debbie does

What we need is less people. Simple, use a condom.

[–] Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds like a literal nightmare to me. No garden to enjoy. No vegetables. No privacy. No ability to get solar panels.

No room for improvement. Basement second levels. Changing plumbing windows etc. No ability to charge your ev.

Fuck is this some corporate bullshit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] obinice@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Blocks of flats are awful places. No garden to put up a workshed, or greenhouse or anything at all, or play with your dog or kids (and no dog - it would be cruel to keep a dog in a flat and not have it able to roam a garden all day), they're noisy, loud neighbours can be above, below, to the left, to the right, and in front ...

You can't modify your home how you'd like, can't choose what utility companies run into your home, can't let your kid cycle up and down the street and still be able to see and hear them from the windows etc.

I see your point about density absolutely, but I HATE flats. Awful places.

I also hate how people have started trying to make them sound fancy and posh by calling them "apartments" to try to sound fancy and European/French, as if that will make them more appealing.

[–] JGrffn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sorry, but fuck this idea in its entirety. This would allow for MORE apartment buildings to be built, since that is how capitalism works, which results in more damage to the surrounding wildlife. L

We need more regulations, and we need a more conscious approach to our housing in general. We should be approaching this with symbiosis in mind, cooperating with nature rather than bending it to our will.

Those houses on the left? Yeah, you could cram so many actual gardens that give you actual food and which could bring so much biodiversity, but we sticking to flat, pure grass gardens that do nothing other than be flat and look green. Fuck everything here.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The issue is that all of those apartments are owned by one person getting filthy fucking rich from rent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] oldfart@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yaay, space for 24 more apartment buildings!

[–] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

This is exactly what will happen. And a shopping mall and a shopping mall parking lot.

load more comments
view more: next ›