this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
125 points (95.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3862 readers
217 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't an impeachment need a majority in the house and then the senate?

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, I got confused with this part:

This triggers a federal impeachment trial in the United States Senate, which can vote by a two-thirds majority to convict an official, removing them from office. The Senate can also further, with just a simple-majority vote, vote to bar an individual convicted in a senate impeachment trial from holding future federal office.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Ah, yeah. If they reach the 2/3 to remove, then a second vote can be held to ban from office with a lower 50%+1 vote.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 27 points 11 months ago

If he couldn't be removed after two(or was it three?) impeachments, and being convicted of 40 something felonies... What is this going to do?

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Despite the dramatic announcement, Green's effort lacks support from Democratic leadership. A senior House Democrat told Axios that Green's impeachment articles would go nowhere.

Democratic Representative Pete Aguilar echoed this sentiment, saying, "This isn't a focus of the Democratic Caucus."

So what exactly is a focus of the Democratic Caucus?

As near as I can tell, their focus is entirely on registering just barely enough tepid opposition to the plutocrats' agenda to avoid looking too much like blatant collaborationists and.... that's about it.

[–] mimavox@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

To roll over an play dead and hope that Trump will reap the consequences of his actions at some point. Not the greatest strategy.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

It's not going to go anywhere though. That is the truth.

Frustratingly I don't think anyone has an answer to your question.

[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 0 points 11 months ago

To say meaningless words while secretly supporting Trump so they can all buy up weakened stocks and put all the blame on Trump.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

As much as i would love for orange jesus to be tried and relieved of duty, pushing this when you don't have the votes just diminishes the interest/confidence.