this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
39 points (95.3% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3963 readers
197 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Aren't the Yankees using HK 417 or smth like that too?

Also what is everyone rambling about with all the personal weapons? I remember that they were already unhappy about them when i was in kindergarten.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I think that's a bit of a tangent, as the British rifle above is not the same caliber as the HK417, and it doesn't use the HK designed piston system. The KS1/L403A1 is a traditional Stoner operating system in 5.56mm.

The US Army and US Air Force did buy about 8,000 HK417 based M110A1 rifles. A niche rifle, and now with the XM7 being adopted by the Army, I'm not sure how much of a DMR program using 7.62 is really going to be pursued outside of specialized units.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The marines are using the HK416

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The original comment compared the KS-1 to a HK417, and I pointed out the difference in both caliber and operating system between those two. The HK416 is an irrelevant tangent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At least they got rid of the requirement for the insanely designed charging handles like the L119s had out the box.