this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
70 points (88.9% liked)

Open Source

36307 readers
1 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

In case anyone had the same kneejerk reaction: no, this is not about privacy etc. Just performance, according to OOP.

Still, this reads like a reaction to a recent overblown debacle.

edit: no, it actually does say "hardened security" in the README, lol, but the whole project seems to boil down to some compiler flags.

[–] wondrous_strange@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Honestly, OOP should've broadcast that fact. It is a lot easier sell than letting people think they changed the code somehow.

Not sure why they are trying to show it as a seperate project.

[–] 4oreman@lemy.lol 2 points 9 months ago

*not overblown

[–] Inf_V@kbin.earth 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

how does it compare to regular firefox? is there any substantial changes?

[–] hmmm@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] mr_satan@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Just looking at the provided numbers it feels marginal, how is it much better?
Biggest increase is like ~12 % on one of the benchmarks. Other benchmarks don't show any significant changes

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This benchmark is against Thorium / Mercury. Which is already way faster than regular Firefox. The total aggregated speed is considerable. https://thorium.rocks/mercury_performance

[–] mr_satan@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago