This is literally step 1 in a dictatorship. Not kidding. Silencing of political opposition and critics in a free democracy? Nah.
this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38472 readers
362 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I generally agree, but I think we're already past step 1.
Finally! This is what true freedom of speech looks like. Imagine being so free to say things and NEVER have to hear anyone oppose you.
Trump says a lot of things that, if taken in a certain light, can be NCII. Might be a good idea to flag his posts on all platforms so that they can be further investigated by those platforms if this passes.
All with the goal to keep NCII off the internet, of course.
NCII?
From the article:
While the bill is meant to address a serious problem—the distribution of non-consensual intimate imagery (NCII)
Ah, must have missed that. Thanks.
How can the imagery be intimate if it's non-consensual?
Revenge porn
Mussolini would be proud. His teachings are being followed a hundred years after he wrote the book on this topic.