this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45946 readers
3924 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A sharply divided Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that the Trump administration must comply with a district court order and pay out nearly $2 billion in foreign assistance funds to nonprofit aid groups for work already completed on the government's behalf.

The court ruled 5-4 with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett siding with the liberal justices.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I have been watching this case for a little while and it looks like the most likely one to show how much power the judicial branch has under this administration.

I would wager the answer is "none", but we won't know for sure until it happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Maybe not as much as we would like, but each court order gives departments more leverage to resist illegal executive orders. We’ll see more and more examples like USADF barring DOGE from entering the building.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shocking. I figured the supreme court was just a Trump yes-man now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Only on the really important stuff.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This freeze hurt private companies.

And everyone knows that companies are a higher class citizen than people, so the court defended the companies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Supreme Court also desperately wants to uphold the make-believe idea that they are legitimate. Which means they might occasionally rule against Trump just to support that narrative.