You don't lay off engineers to become more agile, all it does is make the company more fragile
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)
PC Gaming
14588 readers
715 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
To think otherwise would be senile
Doesn't stop the execs getting docile
they are imbecile
And incredibly facile.
Their concept of what makes a game profitable is incredibly puerile. The result has been a scene that's increasingly sterile.
just fyi to folks the word agile here is in a business context like pivot or out of the box thinking and not agile methodology.
Synonymous with "fluid" or "flexible" or, "shifting the goal posts"
I don't understand: what's going on with the gaming industry? Is it suddenly not profitable anymore?
It's profitable, the problem is it's not profitable enough.
The problem is copyright that benefits only a tiny group of giant companies known as "les ayants-droits" in french. Copyrights as of today are not made to benefits the artisans, the workers but the black-suit men. The whole culture has been walled like that... The music industry, cinema industry and now game-industry...
The issue lies with these publishers.
See the problem is that they don't want to just make money, they want all the money and if your game you're proposing isn't based on a existing known IP and doesn't include psychological manipulation to make all the money, preferably through a live service, well these executives don't want none.
The bottom is kinda falling out of the market and investors have dried up, largely because AAA has had too many extremely costly fuck-ups recently. Now the whole sector is looking bad, and it's been trickling down into impacting the ability for AA studios and indie teams to find funding for their projects.
Is it suddenly not profitable anymore?
The answer is in the question.. it Is suddenly not profitable ~~any~~more
Plus, maybe the bunch of bigbuck$ games that recently bombed made investors slightly panicky.
Well; I was one of the people that bought Minute Of Islands when it came out. Nice game - mournful tone, but beautiful in places. Bit of a "walking simulator" disguised as a platform game, though - not much replay value, I don't think.
What does surprise me is that Fizbin had hundreds of employees to lose, however. MoI had a really "art school indie" feel to it - I'd have guessed at more like ten employees having played through it. Gris (by Nomada) is the kind of *art platformer" that I'd draw as a comparison - Gris has much more action - and they look to be about forty people.
Obviously this is bad for everyone involved, but I suspect that the mismanagement that got them here might have been "dreaming too big" rather than purely "screwed by the publisher".