this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
311 points (89.4% liked)

Technology

81161 readers
4453 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 80 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The 'forest' cut down there is just a wood farm. There's no ecosystem lost, since these farm are basically sterile

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trees are trees, they still have a huge impact on the environment.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Trees are trees, but trees aren’t forests. And a trees don’t have nearly the ecological impact of forests. In fact, in the U.S. and around the world we have the problem of way too many trees, which is causing apocalyptic ecological damage, because they’re the wrong kind.

Cutting down all those trees in a tree farm isn’t hurting the environment very much for the same reason that randomly planting a bunch of trees for a tree farm doesn’t help the environment, which is why conservation is so important.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There’s no ecosystem lost, since these farm are basically sterile

Wow. All star naturalist here.

[–] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 6 points 2 years ago

As @Encrypt-Keeper put it so well:

Trees are trees, but trees aren’t forests.

Forests are what's actually worth prtotecting. This is not different from a field of corn. There is no ecological value to a farm of pine trees. If you ever walked in one, you would know that.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Trees planted there to farm wood. It's a wood farm, not a natural forest. Get over it already.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

With that logic we could cut down pretty much every single forest in Sweden and tell people to stop crying about it.

Edit: Why the down votes? We pretty much have no natural forests left in Sweden. It's basically all mono cultures planted with the intent to be cut down and sold. But if that's the only forests you have they're still very valuable (as forests I mean).

[–] holgersson@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why the downvotes

I for my part downvoted because it's just false equivalence. Cutting down a part of a commercial forest is pretty far from completely cutting "every single forest" in Sweden.

Is it great that trees were cut down without replanting? No.

Is there a perfectly cleared and infrastructurally connected plot of land in Brandenburg that Tesla could have used instead? Also no.

Your comparison was basically the same as "We sell a plot of land to Elon? Why not just sell every plot of land to him then!".

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The point is not that sweden is selling every inch of land to elon.

The point is that every forest in sweden is "commercial forest" so that's a meaningless justification.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one -1 points 2 years ago

Ok, but take a step back. You’re now using the lack of original forest in Sweden to somehow argue against commercial forest in Germany being chopped down to make way for construction.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Ah I see the problem then. I wasn't trying to equate anything. I was simply addressing the reasoning behind the statement (that non-natural forests don't matter), taking it to the extreme to make point. I don't know anything about the forest in question, and I wasn't talking about it.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wanna bet that gigafactory somehow gets closed down or cancelled before opening? Tesla might not even survive that long.

[–] ludw@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

Unlikely as it opened in 2022...

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your comment looks sexy on sync

[–] tamiya_tt02@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm on Sync for Android and mine doesn't line up.

[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm on Android 15 Beta, maybe this has an effect on the layout ?

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

It lines up for me on Jerboa

[–] B312@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You guys can see profile pictures?

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Is it cheaper to cut down a forest than to buy a agriculture field?

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is it cheaper to cut down a forest than to buy a agriculture field?

That area was planted to be cut down. It was a monoculture for wood harvesting and the surrounding area still is, AFAIK. The only change to the original plan has been to not plant young trees again after cutting everything down and instead build a factory.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 10 points 2 years ago

Effectively, they did buy an agriculture field.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 6 points 2 years ago

Depends. If you need specific location for logistic reasons, in the long run it might be

[–] Random123@fedia.io 4 points 2 years ago

Probably since physical labor jobs is valued so cheap and thats not mentioning that immigrants are easily used for that kind of work for even cheaper

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm gonna go ahead and guess cyber truck 2 is going to be made of wood.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

CyberTruck X(ylem).

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The wooden Cyber Truck is already a thing. Relevant video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUp1KHIfme0

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Electric cars are here to save the oil and auto industries, not the planet or humanity.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

I'd rather not have a Tesla even if it meant I dont have an EV ever. Crappy overpriced cars.

Currently yeah, but why can't we see electric cars as the step towards getting rid of oil? More electric cars will make more and more people want cleaner energy. Where eventually the fuel to run the cars comes from fully renewable sources.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The number of trees is Europe is growing quickly. In fact, terribly so, this is an official part of the carbon mitigation strategy of many western democracies.

You can be angry about a lot of things but unless this is some ancient yewtree wood, this is honestly a nothing-burger.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

soggy biscuit

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago

tesla and elon have never been about being eco friendly or environmentally conscious

[–] charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can't we just find some kind of space vehicle to put Musk in and fling it at Mars? He always wanted to go there I've heard.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 5 points 2 years ago

Bet if we bury him in a spacesuit and a chrome coffin he wouldn't know the difference.

[–] Wanderer@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

Elon hate porn.

Jesus Christ guys. Elon lives in your head rent free.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When talking trade-offs you can't just compare a combustion engine to an electric engine, you gotta consider electric public transport too. This has the bonus of pissing on Musk.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes... And also light EVs. They're hundreds of times more efficient and sustainable.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I don't go out much but if I did an ebike is the way to go, if it wasn't raining.

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Germany wanted this. They courted and kissed Elon's ass for this. For all their pr, I've learned that Germans aren't as progressive and smart as they would like the rest of us to think

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where'd you hear Germans are progressive? 😄

[–] holgersson@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Compared to (parts of) the US, we might aswell be.