this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
112 points (95.9% liked)

News

37610 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ineffable@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Did you hear about that crash in Washington?" "Yeah, the Republicans took $3.8m in bribes from Delta to let them cram in an unsafe number of flights, and now 70 people are dead"

That's it, that's the response. No Republican will read this if you send them a link. Just give them true sound bites.

If they say DEI, just ask them about the bribes. If they say terrorism ask them about the bribes. If they blame Biden ask them about the bribes. Don't engage with any sentence that doesn't include the word bribe.

[–] putitoutwithyourbootsted@piefed.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While republicans are generally shit and mostly known for crap like this, unfortunately this was a bipartisan fuckup (accepting bribes from Delta that is)… Excerpted below: “The measure’s sponsor, Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT),… Delta’s political action committee was also among the top contributors to the bill’s cosponsor, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA)”

[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Eh, they blamed Biden and Obama for tons of shit that has nothing to do with them. What goes around is all around.

Also this is a literal flaming example of the kind of world an underfunded and cancelled agency US will look like.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 year ago

Months before last night’s fatal aircraft collision, lawmakers dismissed safety warnings and approved an airline-backed measure that increased flight traffic at Washington, DC’s already overstressed airport — the site of the disaster.Months before Wednesday night’s fatal midair collision of an American Airlines passenger jet and an Army helicopter in Washington, lawmakers brushed off safety warnings amid midflight near-misses and passed an industry-backed measure designed to add additional flight traffic at the same DC airport where the January 29 disaster unfolded. Soon after a March 2023 near collision at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, House lawmakers considered a provision to increase the number of flights allowed at the facility. It is one of only two airports in the country owned by the federal government, giving Congress unique authority over its operations. The legislation was supported by lawmakers seeking more direct flights to their home states and airlines eager for expanded routes. It was opposed by lawmakers who asserted that the airport was already overstressed by flight volume in the capital region’s busy airspace. “The bill just proposed would go far beyond past attempts to expand slots at [the Reagan Airport], dangerously overloading the airport’s operational capacity to benefit one airline,” Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA) told the Washington Post at the time. “The very title of the ‘Direct Access to the Capital Act’ gives the game away that this bill is written to maximize the personal convenience of a comparatively small number of powerful, well-connected individuals at the expense of safety and efficiency of flights — which should be our top priority.” The measure’s sponsor, Rep. Burgess Owens (R-UT), insisted: “Deliberate misinformation has been circulating wildly among my colleagues, and I want to be clear: Our effort is not about benefiting one airport, one airline, or any one member of Congress. It is about empowering American consumers by providing more options and greater convenience for people traveling to and from Washington, D.C.” Among Owens’s top contributors is the corporate political action committee of Delta Air Lines, which pressed for the measure. Delta’s political action committee was also among the top contributors to the bill’s cosponsor, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA). Delta spent more than $3.8 million lobbying Congress, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Transportation Department, and other regulators on the Reagan Airport expansion and other issues in 2023 alone. The measure was narrowly voted down. However, less than a year later, a similar provision was added to a 2024 Federal Aviation Administration reauthorization bill. The measure prompted new warnings from lawmakers concerned that the airport near the US capital was already overstressed and additional flights could create dangerous conditions.

“Yesterday, [the Reagan Airport] experienced a close call as two planes narrowly avoided a collision. This incident echoes a similar incident in March 2023 where two planes almost collided on DCA’s runway,” said Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD) in April 2024 as the bill was being finalized. “These near-misses underscore the critical need to safeguard the airport from additional flight operations. The safety of the public should be of the utmost concern in the [Federal Aviation Administration] bill, and increasing slots at this airport undermines that safety.”

Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine (D) aired a similar warning.

“The near-miss crash at DCA yesterday is yet another example of why we can’t keep cramming more flights to this airport,” Kaine tweeted at the time. “I’ve been warning about this for years — the system is overwhelmed and it’s a threat to public safety.”

The expansion provision was also opposed by a group of lawmakers who said that Reagan Airport is among the busiest in the country and warned against additional flights.

“The House rejected this measure with a bipartisan vote, and its authors were so sure they would lose a floor vote in the Senate that they barred all amendments, including a proposal to ensure the added flights were not dangerous,” a group of House lawmakers from the region wrote at the time. “In a shameful moment for the Senate, the majority will of both chambers was overruled in a backroom deal that put special interests above the safety and convenience of millions of Americans.”

They added: “Every federal and regional entity involved in operations at [the Reagan Airp