this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
461 points (100.0% liked)

News

36439 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Over 18,000 unionized Costco employees, represented by the Teamsters, voted overwhelmingly to authorize a nationwide strike if a new contract is not reached by January 31.

Workers demand "fair wages and benefits," citing Costco's $254 billion in annual revenue and a 135% profit increase since 2018.

Practice pickets have already begun nationwide.

Union leaders warn that failure to reach a "historic, industry-leading agreement" could result in a strike, with workers emphasizing their role as the "backbone" of the company's success.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 76 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I thought Costco was a good employer?

[–] ShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the members don't deliver a strike mandate to Union leadership, they have no leverage during contract negotiations. Voting against a strike is directly voting against your own interests no matter how good the employer is.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This righ here, Costco is better than the competition, they still leave a lot to be desired, especially for corp employees

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

That may be why the union leaders aren't talking about matching the market or something similar, but instead a "historic, industry-leading agreement".

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Good” can be relative but isn’t necessarily fair. They might treat their employees better than Walmart but making record profits and not sharing with the employees is not fair or good. The union exists to make them be fair.

Consider that a company has no problem asking the union for concessions during low times. It’s only fair for the union to demand a share of the high times.

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They want a raise. I expect they also want more headcount. Go to a Costco warehouse in a major city and it's absolutely wild how overrun they are. People are buying from Costco because buying in bulk is the only way to make it with current food prices.

[–] decended_being@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago

They were. It's been over 10 years since I worked there, but I wouldn't be surprised if they still are comparatively good, but that's because they have a union.

They are, relatively.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

TIL Costco employees are unionized.

Good for them!

[–] YerbaYerba@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only some. 18k of some 300k+ employees are unionized.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Thing is, Costco takes such good care of most of their frontline employees that the employees legitimately don't see the need for a union, because the company is possibly the only one in the modern world that figured out it's cheaper if you keep employees happy by paying them more.

Their pay scales and benefits are amazing for grocery store work, up to 30 an hour, and there is a direct promotion path from part time checkout clerk up to management with 100k+ salaries.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All employees of corporations need unions, because all corporations inherently have a motive to rob as much value from their employees as possible. And that's the bandaid solution, not the true solution of ending capitalism.

Also, a large part of why they have it so good as is, is because they have a union. It's like saying "we don't need vaccines, we're all healthy!" while forgetting that the vaccines themselves is what made health so good.

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

A So, their annual profits are almost the same amount as the total of their annual membership fees. That means that, essentially, Costco sells everything at cost + operating expenses. I respect the hell out of thst.

That being said, if the teamsters strike, I won't cross the pocket line.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Time to unionize the ionized ones

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Unions nearly always vote to authorize during contract negotiations, to do otherwise removes all their bargaining power.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Got this in my newsfeed and was worried before I found out that this is in the US, lol

Gotta tell Google to stop feeding me American news that sounds like it could be Canadian news