this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2025
265 points (99.3% liked)

xkcd

17027 readers
139 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt text:
I wonder what surviving human held the record before balloons (excluding edge cases like jumping gaps on a mountain bridge). Probably it was someone falling from a cliff into snow or water, but maybe it involved something weird like a gunpowder explosion or volcano.

Explainxkcd: https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/3039:_Human_Altitude

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbal@fedia.io 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm more interested in the altitude of the median human. I suppose it's increased slightly since the invention of office buildings, chairs, and so on.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Chairs were a game changer

[–] Repelle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Chairs are overrated. I pretty much always choose the floor. Even the couch tends to be used mostly as a backrest for sitting on the floor

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The floor is great. It’s really hard to fall off the floor.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

vertigo enters chat

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

I wonder if it may well have gone down with the combination of boom in population and rapid urbanization around coasts.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 20 points 2 years ago

I thought this was a beautiful way to see our progress out in one frame. Then I thought, what about human object reach? So Voyager 1 would be about three more log ticks up at 25 billion km (about the top of the nav buttons) with other probes falling below that at their appropriate times.

[–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The pre-1800 numbers sound too low. There are lots of old buildings much higher than 10 meters high, and I doubt they were all unoccupied at the same time.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

If you look at the description of the data ie. That falls are considered to be gaining altitude not losing altitude, they seem to be referring to distance from solid object connected to ground not distance from ground or sea level. So mountains and buildings don't count unless you jump off of it.

[–] Fermion@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago

Even before tall buildings, trees should put the noise floor above 30 meters.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

very approximate

But what are the constant dips between years?

[–] jungle@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Must be years without launches.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So in 1882 nobody went above 1.5 meters.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Something weird must've been going on for sure. Two years later Flatland was published.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lol, immediately as the 2D book is published, boom, 3km in 3rdD!

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I want to see how this looks without the log scale on the y axis.

[–] j4yt33@feddit.org 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Should include below the earth's surface too. That would be a lot less impressive.

[–] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Poster's note: I just noticed it uploaded and didn't see it posted yet, so I rectified that.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

But the Apollo program was fake propaganda!