United States | News & Politics

3543 readers

200 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

simsymbiote@midwest.social

Type1@midwest.social

exposingfash@midwest.social

122

Jeff Bezos' WaPo reeling from losses and 'internal drama' as Trump returns to DC: report (www.rawstory.com)

submitted 11 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/usa@midwest.social

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

At a time when the always newsworthy Donald Trump is headed back to the White House, the venerable Washington Post should be gearing up to cover his second term but instead is being subjected to an exodus of top reporters and internal strife, reports the Wall Street Journal's Alexandra Bruell.

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 31 points 11 months ago

A loss of 100 million is significant to most, but not bezos.

[+] whostosay@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Money.

[–] ScoopMcPoops@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

How were The Onion writers able to buy their publication back? Was it just dirt cheap?

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Divide and conquer. By destroying large journalistic institutions, or converting them into voice boxes for nationalistic propaganda and policiy, the criticism of large corporate and governmental institutions becomes diluted and harder to find. The eventual plan is probably to use the dissolution of net neutrality to heavily limit access to dissenting voices from independent journalists and/or just people making dissenting content, effectively shadow banning anyone who poses a threat to the state and corporate power, while also preventing potential future rival voices and political parties from gaining a foothold in the minds of the populace at large.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

We're going need a army of Lugi's. When do we get started. Revolution is needed instead we are rolling fast into a nightmare version of 1984.

[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Net Neutrality has nothing to do with viewpoint. It refers to IP source and destination; e.g. AT&T can’t cap Netflix but let their affiliate Max through.

Just jumbling up a bunch of words you heard, that’s solid reasoning!

[–] the_frumious_bandersnatch@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Replace "Netflix" and "Max" with "Substack" and 'Washington Post" and what you wrote absolutely applies to viewpoint.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ryan grim and the intercept's co founder just started something, "Drop site" IIRC.

Also, I think "Semafor" might be a sort of gathering place forming for folks wanting a better way. https://www.semafor.com/article/10/18/2022/what-is-a-semaform-anyway-and-why-should-you-care

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I had no idea this was already in motion, thank you.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Wish bezos would choke on a fat dick

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Glad to hear it. Let's hope the trend continues.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Why though? They're all friends.