this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

22783 readers
1040 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This didn't go down well.

IT consulting pro-tip: Customers would rather pay for your time and expertise, than be made to feel stupid that they didn't think of something so simple themselves.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

After working in desktop support for a year after college, I realized that people just wanted their problem solved and to not feel frustrated. That realization made my job immensely easier because I pivoted from copying a file in 30 seconds and walking away to talking to them a little bit and letting them feel good after we were done. My ticket closing speed slowed down a little but people felt better and I consistently got positive feedback.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This argument did not go well

You can't convince people to do their job with logic when they just don't want to do their job. After minorities, the thing cops hate most is doing their job.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

WRONG! After minorities, it's poor people. Then doing their job. :P

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought this had to be hyperbole, so I did the math myself. I'm assuming human history is 200,000 years as google says, and we want to narrow this down to the second the bike disappeared. also that the bike instantly vanished so there's no partially existing bike.

each operation divides the time left in half, so to get from 200k years (6.311×10^12 seconds) to 1 would take ~42.58 divisions, call it 43. even if we take a minute on average to seek and decide whether the bike is there or not it would still be less than an hour of manual sorting

hell, at 60fps it would only take another 6 divisions to narrow it down to a single frame, still under an hour

edit: to use the entire hour we'd need a couple more universes worth of video time to sort through, 36.5 billion years worth to be exact. or a measly 609 million years if we need to find that single frame at 60fps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“This argument didn’t go down well.”

🤣🤣🤣 LMAO

What an awesome punchline, should have been on its own line for more impact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This post just shows that the police rarely if ever review any video as this method would've been learned as a result of repeatedly reviewing video.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds about right. Cops have low iqs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yea this is how I managed to convince our building management company to identify bicycle thieves in our communal garage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Part of my job is to review security footage for reported incidents.

If there is a long-lasting visual cue that the event has or has not happened yet (e.g. a window is either broken or not), then a binary search is very useful.

If the event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue (e.g. an assault), then binary search is practically useless.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

This is how I look for the best bits in porn