I can't imagine the difficulty of resolving this, especially since most of the AI models are available for free use.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
218 points (98.7% liked)
News
36457 readers
3295 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah it's a ~~chimera~~ hydra, similar to illegal movie streaming sites. Unless they solve it at the AI engine level, they're just chasing ghosts.
Do you mean hydra?
Shit, my bad. Yep I meant hydra. I need to brush up on my Greek mythology.
You won't prevent it without (or even with) unacceptable restrictions on free speech. Those models have a right to exist.
But you can raise the barrier to entry so people will need to run their own service to do it. You'll make a crazy dent in middle school kids spreading fake nudes of their classmates if they can't just use a managed online service.
New ones maybe. The current ones are out there and won't go anywhere.
It's a hydra. It's effectively impossible.
This is a dog and pony show. Between the unlikelihood of a municipality holding any sway over an internet site, it completely ignores the futility of trying to close the Pandora's box that is AI imagery. I can download half a dozen deepfake video models that would run on a home server, let alone still imaging.
This about the level of technological savvy I would expect from a city councillor.
Predictions:
Men: "I didn't film gay porn, that's a deepfake." The issue is dropped.
Women: "Those videos you're sharing aren't real, use my image without my consent, and I want them removed." She is called a slut.
Got any examples of this that didn’t happen in your head?
Predictions:
Why just women and girls? Why not young boys too?
Most of the time it is against females. Same as rape but guys are still raped too. It is that quiet reality that most people don't acknowledged. Slowly new laws are catching up but it is still one side focused.
I would imagine that any deep fake nude could only give me a bigger weiner.
Or it is revenge and make it even smaller.
Go for it, then I could be proud of having a bigger weiner for once lol
Hung like a field mouse.lol
It's a lawsuit against the sites, so it'll cover those too. But I don't think that AI-generated nudes of boys has been a specific problem yet.
Do give same protection to adult men too
Way to all lives matter the topic buddy
San Francisco and the whole internet police?
It’s an Herculean effort and sadly there’s no way to close the box now, but every bit helps.
Good for San Francisco.
Oh thank Satan it’s just the women and girls. How else can a gay man with a fetish for twinks in clown costumes have any fun without AI generated porn.
(humor)
We need a very low barrier of entry to generate gay porn from a single image of a male before this problem will be taken seriously.