this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

53618 readers
57 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/37281970

Believe it or not, an unexpected conflict has arisen in the openSUSE community with its long-time supporter and namesake, the SUSE company.

At the heart of this tension lies a quiet request that has stirred not-so-quiet ripples across the open source landscape: SUSE has formally asked openSUSE to discontinue using its brand name.

Richard Brown, a key figure within the openSUSE project, shared insights into the discussions that have unfolded behind closed doors.

Despite SUSE’s request’s calm and respectful tone, the implications of not meeting it could be far-reaching, threatening the symbiotic relationship that has benefited both entities over the years.

all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Makes sense really.

OpenSUSE is not the open version of SUSE ( SUSE Linux Enterprise - SLE ). If you compare to Red Hat, OpenSUSE is Fedora, not CentOS.

I can see how people would get the wrong idea.

It is a bit crappy that they waited so long though. On the desktop, OpenSUSE is quite an established brand.

[–] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I vote for the new name to be Margot Linux.

[–] remram@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago
[–] eveninghere@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] SsxChaos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

NotOpenYetSus

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

New name suggestion:

"The Distro Formerly Known As openSUSE"

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

Finally

ClosedSUSE

[–] owiseedoubleyou@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

It's SUSSY Linux time

[–] halm@leminal.space 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just rename it jeSUSE, because nobody fucks with the jeSUSE.

[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Eight years of long term support, dude.

[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Doesn't SUSE actively benefit from openSUSE development? I thought Tumbleweed and SLES had a similar relationship as Fedora and RHEL.

[–] mogoh@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Notice that "Fedora" does not have "Redhat" its name. Maybe the request is reasonable. I don't know how many people think that thy don't need SLES, because there is openSUSE.

[–] frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'd love them to replace SUSE with SUS. Distrowatch click rate +500%

[–] jimbolauski@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago
[–] moontorchy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh wow. SUSE family of distribution is relatively small footprint. Whole story sounds like "splitting the hair". The only reasonable explanation is that SUSE hired some self-glorified marketer from big corp. omg...

[–] fr0g@piefed.social 2 points 2 years ago

No, there are good reasons for it. A lot of people get confused between SUSE and openSUSE offerings. Often SUSE customers show up in openSUSE places, because they believe that it's a place they can get official support. And I'm sure a lot of potential customers might get confused in the same way too.
On the flip side there are also a lot of openSUSE (adjacent) users who think SUSE is (secretly or not) making openSUSE development decisions or think they can dand SUSE to do that and that.

So there are some good reasons to consider a rebranding, but also some speaking against it, like the less of recognition it might entail.

[–] Marmaduke@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Rename it to openSUS