this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

49990 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first time we harvested one of our pigs we had a wake for him. We ate all kinds of delicious cuts and raised a toasted to him.

To Biggun. He was a nice pig and he is a tasty pig.

TO BIGGUN!

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure that comforted Biggun while he was murdered by his friend

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Murder is the killing of a human. You can't murder a non-human.

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you like: pretending that killing an animal is morally equivalent to killing a human

You should try: growing a brain

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When did I say that? My statement points out that rituals to make yourself feel better about killing an animal do not change that animal's experience of being killed or the moral weight of that action

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder, and you said it again just now. Why does killing an animal for food carry any moral weight? Cheetahs don't get any flak for hunting caribou.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A human is an animal too, so i might kill it for food with no moral weight to it. Great.

But if you compare yourself to a cheetah, I get that your intellect and morals are just... Primal 😁

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So to be clear you are officially saying that killing an animal is morally equivalent to killing a human?

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually didn't say anything and just followed this dude's logic. But actually I'd say it's not equivalent. The non-human animals are always innocent. Man is rarely.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, I disagree. Ant colonies go to war with each other all the time. Basically all mammal species see every male in a 5-mile radius fight to the death over a single female. I'm curious what exactly it is the animals are supposed to be innocent of.

[–] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't act on intellect. They just do without knowing what they're actually do. If a dog kicks over your vase, do you see malignant intent? Is the ant-colony going to war for survival acting on greed or lust or the desire to spill blood?

Do they rape because they despise women? Do they kill because they love the control? Do they build political systems made to opress the dumb and/or weak? Do they actually have crab-mentality like we do? Do they actually destroy the planet for their own desires to own as much stuff as possible?

I probably could go on for ages but you get the picture. We do most things while knowing better. We do horrible things, even though we know what others feel. We do most things with intent and knowledge.

We might be innocent as long as we're a toddler crawling around the world, knowing nothing. But now we buy cheap shit made in china, knowing very well that we keep horrible slavery running this way. We know and we ignore. Examples are legion, but you live on this planet too, so you know.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd like to hear your proposed alternative. Or did you just want another excuse tonsay "humanity bad"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder

I didn't, actually

and you said it again just now

I didn't, actually

Why does killing an animal for food carry any moral weight?

Because humans aren't special unique beings with souls that make us the only ones with moral worth. Many animals are capable of suffering and emotion.

Cheetahs don't get any flak for hunting caribou.

We are the ones with the social system allowing for moral frameworks to guide our decisionmaking. Cheetahs aren't moral agents. And if they are, they follow cheetah morality. Plus, they are obligate carnivores anyway (which is why your cat should not be deprived of meat)

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You said they were morally equivalent when you called it murder

I didn't, actually

Yes you did, that's what the word "murder" means

your cat shouldn't be deprived of meat

All right then. Do you believe that owning a cat is immoral, since in order for the cat to thrive, creatures with souls must die?

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are no creatures with souls. But no, I wouldn't say keeping a cat in general is immoral. There are definitely ethical concerns around things like kitten breeding mills and letting cats roam around outdoors, though

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if cats are allowed to eat meat, why aren't we?

[–] Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We are the ones with the social system allowing for moral frameworks to guide our decisionmaking. Cheetahs aren't moral agents ... Plus, they are obligate carnivores anyway (which is why your cat should not be deprived of meat)

please act in good faith or let me know that you're not interested in doing so

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The whole taste argument completely ignores nutrition.

Why don’t you only eat potatoes? Do you derive taste pleasure from B12 supplements?

Attaching a system of morality to a diet is just religion.

I maintain that veganism is just halal/kosher for atheists/agnostics.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The experiences of animals are real and matter. Their suffering is identical in nature to your own. Your moral perspective demands that you deny or ignore these facts. If you can deny that an animal's experience has any value, you can do the same to a human.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you’ve never killed a mosquito, right? Or a spider? Ants, perhaps?

[–] Kacarott@aussie.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a bad faith argument, similar to saying "so you've never left a light on all day?" To someone protesting climate change.

The point of veganism (besides the environmental side) is that there is far too much unnecessary suffering caused to animals; complex and intelligent animals, because of the meat industry. Of course humans will probably always cause death and suffering to animals and even other humans, but accepting this and taking it as a reason for "why should I care at all then" is ridiculous.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think we are at the point where all of humanity can refrain from meat. Maybe most Americans but we should maybe collectively decide this is the goal before pursuing it.

Being incendiary is a strategy that only had small short term gains. Looking at th big picture more people need to understand the argument and it can't be, "you should feel bad." At least not until you've established the expectations and clear reasons why they exist outside of one's own personal judgement.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why can't we?? Meat is a luxury product!! The only reason you can afford it at all is because I subsidize it so heavily with my taxes. It is made by refining cheap, safe, plentiful plant food using the bodies of animals to create a toxic, addictive, scarce luxury good. In that process, MOST OF THE NUTRIENTS ARE LOST. If we all stopped eating meat, we would have such an overabundance of food, we would have to stop farming more than half the land we are currently farming for plants.

Now tell me why YOU can't stop being cruel and violent against the kindest, gentlest creatures on the planet? Because even if you can come up with a tortured hypothetical reason some unlikely hypothetical person can't, if you can, then what you are doing is atrocity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnarchistsForKamala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you can deny that an animal's experience has any value, you can do the same to a human.

values are subjective

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Okay? So?

Being cruel and violent to innocent creatures requires that you learn to suspend your empathy. Being cruel and violent to innocent creatures EVERY SINGLE DAY requires that you main your empathy, to actually injure yourself and impair your ability to be empathetic AT ALL.

To respond to your apparent non sequitur, I value compassion and empathy. Don't you?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can deny the importance of human experience (the heat death of the universe will erase all traces of our existence and impact) without wanting to kill humans right now.

How did you conclude the experiences of animals matter?

How do you know animals are having experiences?

How do you know human experiences matter?

I don’t claim to have any answers to the above but I’ve never heard a satisfactory answer to these questions other than ‘I just believe it is so’ and if it boils down to my belief versus your belief I have to conclude that neither one of us actually has any idea.

[–] rekorse@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dont know why you call it your moral system, when your system apparently is that the earth is supreme, humans dont matter, therefore anything that happens is okay. Morals are a societal thing, if you dont care about society then what's the point?

How do you apply this system to your own actions? Just anything goes cause it doesnt matter?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Oh hey, a 1-day-old account posting 6 vegan posts in 1 hour to unrelated communities. I’ve seen this one before.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (55 children)

For real, dead animals taste amazing when you grill them

load more comments (55 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›