this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
-1 points (0.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

33829 readers
1652 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not really. These aren't monetized sites, but just individuals inviting guests to use their instance over self hosting their own, and there's other instances people can move to.

Each instance is better seen as individual forums than a reddit type centralized site. Some forums allows cross account logins, and some you have to create another account. And defederation doesn't cause that instance to cease to exist like banning a community or subreddit does.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Money is not the only reason why people/ businesses want to censor stuffs. It can also be because of politics or ideology

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

lolno

You can say whatever the fuck you want, but other people aren't obliged to listen to it or pass it on.

Talk to the hand.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

People aren’t obliged to listen to it but they have no right to prevent other people from seeing or hearing it unless it's stuffs like hate speech and racism

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Get fucked.

It's our right to live in a safe environment without Nazi fucks.

You have an entitlement to speech, you're not required to be heard or listened to by me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Who the hell talked about nazis.I'm with censoring hate speech and i don't believe in total free speech. Did beehaw defederated with lemmy.world becauae of nazis? Yes you don't have to listen to anybody but you have no right to decide for other what to see. That's why i'm against defederation and with the ability of individual users to block whatever they want

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

People not wanting to engage with other people is not censorship. Nobody is entitled to someone else's attention.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

I agree but here we are talking about preventing potential people who would like to hear, read or see certain posts

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes and no. The people still have the voice, you're not preventing them from talking to other people, you're just preventing them from accessing your instance.

Centralized websites like Facebook, Twitter, whatever. That would be censorship if they remove somebody's voice.

Decentralized instances, are closer to private communities. They're focused, and they create curated viewpoints.

If the federated universe gets dominated by one or two powerful instances, then yes it would be censorship, but if people are using it at a decentralized fashion: it's just communities expressing preferences.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

Censorship is not only about completely remove somebody voice. Limiting the visibility of somebody voice is also censorship. It doesn't matter if people are centralized in few instances or not , you still are limiting opinions that re not off topic from reaching certain people.I think some stuffs should be censored like clear hate speech and racism etc.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Boo hoo, people aren't being forced to put up with my stupid shit, waah!"

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

You can try to spin it in a different way. But it's still censorship

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, it is, but I'm not a Libertarian - some censorship is good. Fascists, trolls, and child pornographers deserve to be censored.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

I completely agree with those cases

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

You could also say it's a form of tribalism

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

In many cases it is simply censorship.