this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2024
155 points (96.4% liked)

Science

5843 readers
42 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everybody gave them shit for admitting to not know how magnets work (in a song), and yet, 99% of the public don't even know there's three forms.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

I bet you don’t know how to use the three shells

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

For anyone interested in what they could be used for, but without time to read the article,

On a nano level, everything we store inside our devices is the result of the coordinated action of electrons. If these materials could be improved, it could mean higher efficiency, more storage within the same size of material, and less loss when data is accessed.

Because

...in [this] paper, scientists show that they can tune these materials very precicely in order to create specific directions of magnetism.

While the traditional ferromagnets we use today are fine in many ways, they aren’t ideal, and can introduce a blurring between separated bits of data known as crosstalk.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nano machines!? I wonder if this will allow smaller than 1nm chip manufacturing.

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

THE NANO MACHINES WILL ALLOW MORE MEMES

[–] fargeol@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a second form of magnetism?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

apparently it's one of those "technically correct but also obviously nonsense" things: there's no different type of electromagnetism, but specific materials can be magnetic in different ways, dimagnetic/ferromagnetic/paramagnetic, and the stuff the article is about seems to be at least the fourth kind... urgh

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago

He has the kavorka!

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

2025 we’re finding out animal magnetism was real all along, but it requires a certain concentration of microplastics to work

[–] UniversalMonk@mander.xyz -5 points 1 year ago

The best kind!

[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh, don't we already have three? Dia-, ferro- and paramagnetism?

[–] AllToRuleThemOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

and Antiferro-, Ferrimagnetism.

[–] arken@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Mesmer was right all along

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Magnets are the solution, just you wait

[–] Mojave@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Real question:

This article has been SPAMMED over Lemmy for the past week, what made you post it 8 days after it was made?

That's essentially old news on a platform that moves as fast as this

[–] theorychapter@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

This is my first time seeing this article and I scroll through all a few times a day

[–] UniversalMonk@mander.xyz 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sorry, it was my first time seeing it. And when I posted it to this community, I didn't get an alert that it's already been posted. So I posted.

I sorta go on a science binge every few weeks. So I just read a bunch and post what is interesting. But I don't follow it every day. Hence me replying to you after 18 days. Thanks!