this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
297 points (98.7% liked)

News

28391 readers
4667 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 89 points 3 months ago (1 children)

For the lazy:

the president did not commute the sentences of three people whose crimes included mass shootings or acts of terrorism: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, one of two brothers responsible for the deadly Boston Marathon bombing in 2013; Dylann Roof, a White nationalist who massacred nine people at a historically Black church in Charleston, South Carolina, in 2015; and Robert Bowers, who killed 11 worshippers at Pittsburgh’s Tree of Life Synagogue in 2018.

I don't agree with the death penalty on principle, so I understand why he didn't commute those sentences, but I still think he should have.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If he commuted those sentences, though, the narrative would focus on how Biden was being soft on mass murderers, and not on the death penalty itself.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago (15 children)

Who cares? He doesn't need to appear "tough on crime" for reelection.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Idiots will condemn the entire American democratic party because of it though. Either way.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Apparently Americans can't remember what happened four years ago, so this wouldn't even register by the next election cycle.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Considering Biden’s actions with Israel, he is soft on mass murderers

[–] [email protected] 71 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Morally it’s the right thing to do in my eyes. It’s also surprising how the pro life and pro death penalty people are the same people usually.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pro life only lasts until you're born. After that it's pro death.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

There's a very bad joke o remember hearing a long time ago. It's something along the lines of: "I'm in favor of killing babies, but I don't like to give women a choice." Most pro-life people actually are that, except they extended "baby" way before birth in a stupid way. They're fine with killing actually post-birth babies though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

He didn't commute the one Boston bomber, Dylan Roof, and the Tree of Life shooter. Which is good. I don't agree with the death penalty but you can't really pardon people like that.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's not a pardon. They would still be subject to the harshest punishment possible in civilized countries, and would never again be a threat to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most civilized countries have abolished the death penalty

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

Thank you for clarifying my point.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And the confusion here is exactly why it would have been a PR nightmare. The average American is really stupid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Well I more just mean HE couldn't because probably that would be unpopular with the groups who were targeted by them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think you can, especially when the sentence is still life in prison. Remember that accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt, so they would not ever be paroled.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

These weren't pardons, but commuted sentences. I don't know what the stipulations surrounding that are

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt

This was true, but that no longer applies. (at least at the federal level; I have no clue how state courts have ruled on this.)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

Well I have to admit I agree with the court there. A pardon should not be an admission of guilt. So even though that changes what I said, I have to concur with them. Thank you for letting me know.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I actually have a friend who’s quite… strange. He’s pretty right wing, very into certain conspiracy theories, pro musk, etc, yet one of the nicest guys you’ll meet and certainly the guy you’d be calling to bail you out of jail in a pinch. Anyways, he actually opposes the death penalty exactly because he’s pro life. Said he couldn’t reconcile both of those stances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

That's good! That means he's at least a reasonable person. He can think for himself and can consider if ideas are idiologically consistent. I hope that eventually translates to him having empathy with people and then noticing how conservative politics fucks people over just for the sake of having an enemy though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

It's only surprising if you know nothing about the group beyond the inaccurate name they use to identify themselves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Should preemptively pardon luigi

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Biden is a corporatist, he is literally not on our side with that one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I know, I Said should not would. Who knows the person puppeting him weekend at Bernie's style might?

Look I need something to hope for lmao.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Lmfao "with that one"

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Of course, Trump will have millions of death row sentences to hand down once they find out how expensive those concentration camps are and how long it will take to get countries to be willing to take all of those millions of people back and decides to come up with a Final Solution.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We already have a well-developed forced labor prison infrastructure, and there will be plenty of farm work to do. The camps will pay for themselves, and enrich big corporations in the process.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

Yep, lots of people are going to make lots of money off of this. Just not the brown people working in the fields. I guess this is what the GOP means when talk about the good old days.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't the expense of the camps part of the intent?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the intent is genocidal fascism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Why not both?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And Super Brother of Mario?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Gotta have a sentence before a commutation or pardon, I believe.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Nixon didn’t before his pardon, but I suspect it would be necessary for a commutation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry Trump has a plan for Dylan Roof and Robert Bowers that doesn't involve them getting executed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

To hear it from the conservative side of my family ... "Is there no limit on how many people he can commute?" and "There's no way he's able to sign all those letters, he can barely keep his eyes open."

I don't know how accurate it is, but they were saying he has already freed 1,500 people. I asked how many of those people were convicted of non-violent drug related charges, and they did not know nor did they seem to care. I thought that was interesting given some of my relatives', shall we call it, histories.

load more comments
view more: next ›