Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Prediction: he doesn't show up and nothing happens in response.
I'll gladly be proven wrong though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
I mean, as an ex-president he received nothing more than a stern look for anything. Now he's president-elect. You will not be proven wrong, I'm sorry to say.
If he doesn't show up it's likely they will dismiss the case.
Yeah it's his lawsuit against ABC. Likely it just gets dismissed if he refused to sit for a deposition.
Seems likely that the parent commenter will be proven wrong, then.
Pretty sure legally he can not show up and just say it's because he has president things to do and he would have immunity
It really is just like children playing make-believe, making up rules as they go along 🤸♂️
Well, have I got news for you...
Hey, there's a key difference with this case vs. all the other cases. It's a civil lawsuit that Trump instigated. So he is the plaintiff here, he is on the offense in the lawsuit. Shouldn't he want to give his side of the story? And if he delays this one, wouldn't the judge be well within their rights to say "If you can't tell us what he did that warrants a penalty, shouldn't we just drop all this"?
And actually, I think this is the outcome Trump wants. He doesn't want to actually win this. He wants the judge to throw it out for entirely sane reasons, because it's one more thing to complain about and he knows his followers won't look into the key differences between this and other cases.
If your only platform is grievance, you need new grievances to keep things fresh, even if you manufacture them yourself.
Media reports news
"ILLEGAL!" the orange man shouts.
nothing will happen, doesn't matter.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York#Delayed_sentencing_hearing
On September 6, Merchan postponed the sentencing hearing to November 26.[550][551] At the presidential immunity hearing on November 19, the Manhattan DA's office said it would consent to postpone sentencing until Trump leaves office.[552] Three days later, Merchan canceled the sentencing date without setting a new one.[553]
This is the one where he got found guilty on 34 felonies. Juan Merchan is a coward.
10 upvotes for bemoaning that Trump won't be punished if he loses a lawsuit he instigated.
well, the asshole has been on the recieving end on so many fucking lawsuits, it gets hard to interpret news about "TRUMP TOLD TO DO SOMETHING IN LEGAL CONTEXT" without thinking his ass is being told off, but won't suffer any consequences.
ITT: A lot of people who can't even read a headline for comprehension.
well, the asshole has been on the recieving end on so many fucking lawsuits, it gets hard to interpret news about “TRUMP TOLD TO DO SOMETHING IN LEGAL CONTEXT” without thinking his ass is being told off, but won’t suffer any consequences.
There will be no legal justice with Trump.
The only realistic options are vigilante justice or no justice.
Something something blood of patriots something something...
Are you suggesting that ABC News should do something about this case outside of the law? Maybe they should send a large guy to tell Trump he needs to keep quiet about this defamation business.
Anyone can decide to become a vigilante. Saying anyone should is against the TOS, so no.
I'm suggesting that legal justice WILL NOT happen as indicated by the plethora of times Trump has broken the law and faced minimal or no consequences. He is above the law. That leaves us with two remaining options.
Someone could become a vigilante because they were frivolously sued for defamation. I guess we'll see what Stephanopoulos' next move is.