this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1 points (66.7% liked)

memes

14293 readers
3248 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People just really need to support it. It's far better than jpg or png. It's the go-to for web right now, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But why is it better? My experience is clicking on webp format opens in browser instead of my image viewer

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

It has more efficient lossy compression then JPEG. It has more efficient lossless compression then PNG. More efficient compression then gif and supports animation like gif. It allows for more colors then any of those 3. You can have a single for extension for photos graphics, and animations and costs less storage and bandwidth saving money and making a better ui.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds like you need upgrade your image viewer? Everything else is loading it fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People just really need to support it.

This right here sir. You missed this part.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't seen a single browser that didn't support webp

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Lots of image viewers and media programs/apps dont support it currently. Which is a hassle when you've downloaded a webp and cant view or edit it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Webp supports 24 - bit RGB w 8 - bit Alpha channel. It also has better lossless and lossly compression. And it handles transparency and animation better than other formats at a smaller size.

It is smaller, better, and faster.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You get the exact same quality at around ~25% smaller than other image formats. Unfortunate that it’s not supported by everything, but yeah it’s a better image format practically in that sense.

On the web this saves money when storing at a large scale, and it can have a significant impact on page speed when loading websites on slower connections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is this the latest hate trend? Is it that time of the year again?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

How can one even get annoyed this much by WebP lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is rather the opposite of the meme. The file format is fine, but there is so little effort into making it happen.

If we were trying then I should be able to upload webp images everywhere. The most egregious is websites that will convert jpg and png uploads to webp but don't allow webp upload.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As someone who has had to put together websites:

  • It is supported by every major browser
  • It is halving the amount of your mobile data that I am using sending you images (With lossy compression it does even better)
  • It is decreasing my network egress costs
  • It is increasing the number of connections I can serve in a given time period

Nope I am not going to stop using this or AVIF (which does better)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

WebP is awesome. So is JPEG-XL.

JPEG and PNG are archaic and should die already.

.jxl is also coming btw

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Webp

Developed by google, for google products.

Not guaranteed to work with google products (looking at you google voice.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's straight up better though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've personally used webp for when I need lossy compression with alpha channel. What good alternatives are there? Png is not lossy and jpeg does not support alpha. Is JXL better than WebP? AVIF? JPEG2000?