this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
541 points (98.9% liked)

Work Reform

14436 readers
43 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Guardian and Observer journalists have asked people not to share Guardian stories for 48 hours from midnight tonight (Tues), to respect their strike and the virtual picket line

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wicked, I don't have to change anything.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, sure, more power to them but that is not how the internet works? Just ddos your page, come on.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, dude, just commit a cybercrime with a maximum sentence of 10 years instead of just asking people not to use the site for 48 hours. It's genius.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why you do it in a country with no extradition treaty or cyber security.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This guy ddos's! Well, hopefully not since it is a crime after all.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago

Y'know, in Minecraft maybe.

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

It's also actually effective.

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Less links = less ad impressions, less impressions = less money.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't get ad revenue if the site's down.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

But bringing it down is 1)illegal, 2) costly (DDoS cost money), 3) not guaranteed (CDNs can be very resilient) and 4) doesn't show the collective support that not visiting the site does.

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there any background to their strike?

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks.

(If anyone else from the UK wants to read this link you'll need a VPN)

[–] d00ery@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How odd! I think it was working without a VPN when I shared it ..

[–] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Strange! I just wouldn't work when I first tried, but I VPN'd from USA and it worked. Maybe something else happened the first time and I'm misattributing the success.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 1 year ago

If they sell off the Observer, they’ll lose a lot of their TERF columnists like Sonia Sodha, which would make it less problematic to link/subscribe to them.

[–] CityPop@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that my Timezone or theirs?

[–] NickwithaC@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GMT since the Guardian is a UK paper.

[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wouldn't it be more effective if they put a strike notice on their page and shared things prolifically

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 28 points 1 year ago

Well I am assuming this is a strike by the journalists. They only write the stories not control the website. I think they just want there to be a global reduction in traffic to show those they're striking against the fuller effect of their strike.

But, just a guess. I've not looked too much into it.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 2 points 1 year ago

I'm confused.. Tues, or 5-6?