this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2026
498 points (99.6% liked)

politics

31892 readers
2203 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) has “been with the Republicans” since Congress returned, after the Michigan Democrat endorsed former Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.) in the midterms.

“She’s been with the Republicans ever since she’s come back. So she’s been on the Republican side of the aisle,” Ocasio-Cortez said during an appearance on “The Don Lemon Show” that aired Thursday.

“This is just the epitome of a certain kind of transactional politics,” she added. “And it’s really sad.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 22 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

She's going to switch parties. They can have her. Then she'll lose her election in 2028.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago

Like Sinema she may try to go Independent but her cover is blown and at this point she may take more from Republicans than Democrats lol.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 18 hours ago

Really dodged a Fetterman shaped bullet there

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago

send her and fetterfuck off to russia(siberia) to spend the rest of their terms on ice

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago
[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Has been a vassal for the Israeli state.

It seemed clear to me: Israeli handlers told her to jump, and she immediately obliged.

Good riddance to her. I can only hope to see all of them kicked out of our government and military affairs during my lifetime.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 7 points 23 hours ago

Yep Round one is done. We've got 5-6 more

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

She received over $15,000,000.00 in AIPAC donations. Hrmmm...

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The worst part is that's just money that our government has sent over to Israel. It's like money laundering for traitors.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 16 points 18 hours ago

Yep. Every year we send Israel billions in American tax dollars, and they send back a couple million in bribes to our leadership. They've always said that the American government is the best government money can buy. It just amazes me how cheaply it can be had.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Think this is more embezzlement than money laundering. Not that either is a good thing.

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

It's money laundering in the sense that it starts off in a state where it can't be used for the purposes they want, then they send it out into the world, a big chunk of it vanishes, and it comes back in the condition that it can be used to finance their campaigns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 142 points 1 day ago (61 children)

The "moderate" Dems are just Republicans in sheep's clothing. It's a large reason why the symbolism behind removing Jefferies and Schumer is so important and not merely symbolic.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Adam Hamilton who was just elected to Senate in Kansas was a Republican less than a year ago.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Look at Florida. Democrat establishment loves to run Republicans under a Dem banner

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 15 hours ago

We have to start acknowledging that we now have a THIRD party - The Israel Party - that straddles both of the traditional parties. Many legislators are more loyal to the Israeli Party than either of the trad political parties. Dems like Debbie Wasserman Schultz, or Jared Moskowitz, will side with Israel before they support Democrats.

We need to encourage Democrats to NOT be part of the overlap.

load more comments (59 replies)
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago

If Stevens had just stayed hidden in the Republican cloakroom for a little while longer, no one would ever have known.

And no, I'm not even joking: that's literally where she's been hiding.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Much like Sinema, there are MANY of these DINOs who act as Republican sleepers, just waiting for their activation to inflict the most damage. Once that capital is expended, well, then time to be open Republican.

Schumer, Jeffries, Stevens, Fetterman are Sinema. There are many more (e.g., DWS in FL, and Gilibrand in NY)

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

This is why. Nothing will change until we get these traitors out

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Tango@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Was it Jeffries that vetted her?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

For Senate? That was Schumer.

load more comments
view more: next ›