this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2026
709 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

12522 readers
3215 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluewing@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh, I see where he went wrong - "funny post".

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 3 points 5 hours ago
[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

The British isles are just a series of new people showing up and saying “mmm don’t mind if I do” Like, I can think of at least 9 separate groups that invaded, integrating and displacing the already extant groups to different degrees. The saxons were like, at least 5 invasions after stone henge. Hell, the earliest versions of King Arthur are about a dude fighting off the Saxon invasions.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

Isn't that the case nearly everywhere?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I've always wondered about the complete adoration British people have for Saxons out of all the many different succesful invading peoples in their history.

[–] Gilpat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

The french president called the british 'anglo-saxons' but that period of british history ended with the Norman and French invasion of the isles.

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 27 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Not only could it be built today, it was rebuilt by a retired contruction worker named Wally Wallington in the 2000s. Here's his official site documenting it that's linked on his youtube channel.

Turns out, probably just took beams and small stones used respectively as levers and fulcrums to do it. Various aspects of his setup is likely not period-perfect, but I think he demonstrates pretty clearly that this isn't a forgotten ability, it's just been made obsolete by more modern methods.

Here's Wally's final creation as far as I can tell.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

It was also rebuilt perfectly in Esperance Australia as it would have looked when it was new

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't the big mystery that the stones originate from across the country?
There's no professor under this clown mask so please fact check

[–] JayDee@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

From this site ( ~~I only inspected briefly so it might be a conspiracy site idk~~^1^):

The massive outer stones came from about 15 miles north, the smaller inner stones traveled roughly 150 miles from Wales, and the central Altar Stone journeyed at least 750 kilometers from northeast Scotland

Quite impressive, though I think we've compiled a wide variety of ways that could have been done, and have been recreated, for moving massive stones like Stonehenge's. it seems less of 'how' and more of 'which method' that's the mystery at this point. Here's an article that articulates that sentiment, and a video of experimental historians replicating my favorite version of this.

Edit:

  • ^1^ after giving it a more thorough look I feel safe saying this source is respectable.
[–] bampop@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

and a video of experimental historians replicating my favorite version of this

Interesting how they keep it docile by blindfolding it. You don't want one of those things to get spooked and run around stomping on people.

[–] withabeard@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

You also have a (largely) farming population, who have work from the spring into the early Autumn. Then months on end of not much to do. Be drunk, eat into food reserves, stay warm and somehow stay strong enough to be useful farmers next spring. You have a bored population of young, drunk, possibly abusive, probably male.

If you want some semblance of control over that population, you create religion, you tax the religion, you convince people that their gods want them to move that stone. The stone gets moved by those people. The taxes feed and intoxicates them, the work keeps them warm. At different times in history you send them to join the army, build a pyramid, go on a crusade.

Dunno, I could be completely wrong. But it doesn't feel entirely wrong to me that we have a common problem that's been solved in a variety of ways in history and this could fit that pattern.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

Pretty similar to the people showcasing that you can just use rope to walk the mo'ai statues in to place.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 16 points 16 hours ago

“traditional Saxon culture” is pretty funny too given it’s more like a bunch of German mercenaries turned up wearing Adidas and the Britons started wearing Adidas too because they thought it was cool.

[–] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 113 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Low on the IQ bell curve: "Modern British people couldn't make Stonehenge." (Conspiracy theory)

Middle of the IQ bell curve: "Nooo! Stonehenge was made using advanced but historically plausible techniques."

High on the IQ bell curve: "Modern British people couldn't make Stonehenge." (They are just bad at everything)

[–] SpaghettiMaster@feddit.uk 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I grew up not far from stone henge, although Avebury is the better stone circle. It has a pub in the middle of it and I could cycle there from home. Been on a night hike around it too.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

"My henge is better than your henge".

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Well Stonehenge is tiny and they won't let you go up to the stones

It's only tiny because they used " instead of ' on the measurements.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago

Can we stop and get some henge?!

We have henge at home!

Henge at home:

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Nah the modern ones would build half of it. Run it overbudget 3x and the abandon the project at about 65% completion due to increased costs and complications. It would take them 5 years to do it.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 5 points 16 hours ago

The London underground would never be constructed today. It would cost like 40 bajillion dollarydoos

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They are good at inading privacy

[–] WhiplashPost@programming.dev 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty good at invading in general historically

[–] dansel@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Visit a Mediterranean beach during the summer and you’ll realize they’re still invading

[–] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

"The beauty of British women and the taste of British food led Britain to become some of the greatest sailors in history."

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 61 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Stonehenge could be built very quickly with today's machines and technology. But just like cathedrals, the problem isn't the means but the will: nobody wants to waste time and money on religious nonsense anymore.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago

You are completly right. If you have the will and the money, you could call a quarry today and order yourself some big stones. They will fit on an oversized load-truck. Call somebody with one or two of those big cranes. Perhaps also consult an architect or engineer who can calculate the structural integrity. We can totally do that.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Building Stonehenge today would end up in an ill advised contract structure between public and private stakeholders which would be partially responsible for a cost overrun of ~175% and it would ultimately get cancelled after a decade and a half or so when only ~30% was finished.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It would take a competent construction crew like 4 days

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Yeah this was a joke about HS2

[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I don't know about the budget back then, but the real Stonehenge took like a millennia to complete so if anything that's actually finishing early.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Original plans were for a tower but it never got past the ground floor

[–] WhiplashPost@programming.dev 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Whoa, whoa, whoa. I have to stop you right there buster. Stonehenge is not "religious nonsense" it is literally a way to keep track of celestial movement and track the solstices. This allowed for ancient peoples to track the change of seasons and properly plan their agricultural activities. It was entirely practical, and very good at its job as it still works today to an extent.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It was entirely practical,

You can track the seasons using far fewer rocks at a much smaller size. So no, it really isn't.

[–] WhiplashPost@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

oh and who are you the Rock Wrangler? The Time Tempter? The Henge Handler?

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact, henges are a type of earthworks, doesn't have to have a circle, stone or otherwise.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Most henges are round though, because that's the most area for the circumference. And when you've been shoveling dirt for weeks, that matters.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Someone built a modern one in SW washington state, although I think it’s just cast concrete. Certainly doesn’t look as nice in person

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 16 hours ago

That's extremely not true though. It's what most people waste most time on of anything

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 15 hours ago

Relevant Tom Scott video: https://nebula.tv/videos/tomscott-why-you-cant-touch-stonehenge

(Youtube version coming out in a couple hours)

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It was most recently adjusted in 1963. Arguably it's still a work in progress.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 23 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Surely they have to adjust it twice a year for daylight savings?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AgentSeven@lemmy.zip 20 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Cool video I found of a guy named Wally Wallington building some Stonehenge-style monoliths in his backyard - single-handedly with no modern tools.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›