this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
92 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31407 readers
2029 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, the DNC is gonna push for this dude to be the next president.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The DNC chair went on record saying he wants a candidate like Mamdani, almost immediately after Mamdani won the primary...

Which is pretty much the opposite of Newsom.

He's never endorsed a single candidate during a primary, and ran fair primaries while the chair of Minnesota's state party for a decade...

Which is the exact opposite of what you say will happen.

So why are you saying that 3 weeks from an insanely important midterm election?

[–] Townlately@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Probably just because historically the DNC always pushes the most "moderate" candidate? I mean, there's plenty of precedent.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That's exactly like saying voting is pointless because the next president will be the same as the last two...

Not only is it wrong, it's a self fulfilling prophecy.

The more people repeat it in 2026 because it was true for 30 years the less people vote, and the more likely it is we lose our once in a generation chance at a decent president. And if we actually get that, all we have to do is keep paying attention and vote to keep the streak alive, at this point it's literally that easy.

Picture your ideal president in 2029, and imagine how stupid it would be if I blamed them for stuff trump did, and said they're gonna do all the same shit trump did, because your president holds the same title.

That's literally as fucking stupid as people who believe the DNC is a monolithic institution that operates on long term plans.

It's four year terms of a person who can literally do whatever the fuck they want with the party. Jamie Harrison was Biden's pick who ran it from 2021 to 2025, and I bet you didn't even know that till now.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Because God told me to say it during my prayer session today.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com -4 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

Someone who doesn't throw me under the bus would be nice.

I dunno, man, someone who will actually try to address the issues the nation faces instead of continuing to placate the rich and slowly strip away the rights of minorities.

But, like, I guess that's a mythically tall order.

[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've posted it before and I'll post it again.

Newsom is an archdevil?

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Don't dis Raphael like that! He actually keeps his word.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's uncanny! Personality seems to match too

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You all know whom the guy on the left is by picture? He looks like a dick I will give you that.

[–] decolo@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

It's a devil character from Baldur's Gate 3

https://bg3.wiki/wiki/Raphael

He presents as very genteel and a potential ally, but reveals his true nature under duress

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago

I am still recovering from discovering he was married to Kimberly Guilfoyle

[–] GhostOnTheHalfShell@masto.ai 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With a rusty rail spike

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Fuck you, Gavin. My wife and I both voted yes on 40 and no on 42.