this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2026
147 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31320 readers
2188 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And all we need is for ChatGPT to tell all the idiots to vote blue in the midterms to get this country back on course.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Techbros are in the fascist camp though. That said, even if it were the other way round, if that works, democracy is lost anyway, no matter which side wins.

[–] Heikki2@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

My biggest fear of AI is how its going to dumb us down. If you think about how dumb the average person is, and then water it down further. We are screwed.

I hear friends and family using it for basic things like writing notes. I have friends that use it to write basic code. If you can't do the easy stuff you'll never learn the hard stuff

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

What makes me angry is their "example voter" asks "I'm left on immigration, tell me about the candidates"

  1. Dumb basis for election. Only impeachment will stop wanton murder and overreach on fascist show of force roundup of everyone tanned, and deportation to gulag host countries.

  2. Congress will not create new legislation, though at best perhaps there will be some media circus over ICE abuses, and some conditions on funding which Trump will ignore.

  3. gpt response is detailed support of Trump for GOP side, with zero information about Dem candidates or possible outcome/curtailment of Trump determined abuses of existing legislation.

I'm angry at both how ~~stupid~~ low information the voter is, regurgitating GOP "election focus issues" that are irrelevant to surivival, and have zero impact on WV, and the response that doesn't cut through the irrelevant BS of that election issue to compare individual candidates. Only balance of power party supermajority in house can overcome BS.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I really hate how sometimes the low info/ "independent" voter is catered to in so many discussions, too.

Like someone is totally vindicated of all their responsibility in treating politics like there really aren't any stakes but their personal whims.

You'll hear people proudly talking about their decision to opt out or vote for donnie. Because they were not just tickled pink by the Democratic option. Because the politician didn't meet some arbitrary bar, didn't say the right things on one particular issue, etc.

It's not like politics is some kind of artisanal hipster bullshit that need to cater to the whims of some nebulous "independents" that are just dying to withhold their vote like they are some special bespoke creatures unlike any other. 🙄

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Using an LLM to offer concise summaries of the major platforms and ideas of candidates would be an ideal use of the technology …if there was any way to know that the LLM is being factual and accurate and relatively free of bias in what it produces. But we have no guarantees on this.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago

In fact we pretty much have a guarantee of the opposite. If Sam Altman hasn't already started a bidding war for politicians to pay him to let chatgpt automatically endorse them, he sure as hell will in a very near future.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And we never will, because of the fundamental ways the technology works. LLMs needs nondeterminism in order to function. It's truly a black box, which makes it a nonstarter in any discipline that demands accuracy and integrity and repeatability.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Of course they are. The vast majority of Americans are not critical thinkers.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 78 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah but at least it'll be funny

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago
[–] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

People used to ask Google and use the totally unbiased first result to take a test for this...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They were doing this in the primary.

I was canvassing and a woman whipped out her phone and asked chatgpt which of the candidates most agreed with her. That's who she said she'd vote for.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Too many people (including my boss) seem to think AI is a magic oracle that can replace the whole messy business of ever investigating even the tiniest thing. It's astonishing how many people were apparently just waiting for the first chance to give up on doing anything at all for themselves.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

First they surrendered their knowledge, then their thinking. What is left of them now?

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They rejected the evidence of their eyes and ears. They have nothing left to give.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

"It was their final, most essential command."

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A vote that counts 3.7 times more than mine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Everyone gets a puppy vs diarrhea forever

[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 12 points 1 day ago

LMAO! We’re so fucked.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

When they asked Fox Entertainment News they just vote for Pedo/Nazis

Maybe this will at least shake some people that their stupid “team” doesn’t actually align with their values?

load more comments
view more: next ›