this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2026
318 points (99.7% liked)

politics

31285 readers
1843 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In an interview on Theo Von’s podcast This Past Weekend, Mamdani warned that if the American Dream is just an ideal that’s out of within reach, then people may start to give up.

The democratic socialist compared it to legendary NYC Mayor Fiorello La Guardia’s observation during the rise of fascism in Europe, saying people turned away from democracy not because they were tired of liberty, but because they were tired of being hungry.

“So if democracy doesn’t mean the better life that it has to, it’ll lose its worth. And the same thing with the American Dream: if it’s something you can only see when you turn on your TV or you hear about that one guy you grew up with who made it, that doesn’t mean enough,” Mamdani said.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin1809@piefed.world 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He's right, and people can see he's right, which is why they voted for him to become mayor of NYC

Meanwhile Republicans are a bunch of oligarchs who are like "No you can't vote for socialists because... look at all this culture war stuff! Please keep us in power!"

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 49 minutes ago

Meanwhile ~~Republicans~~ both major parties are a bunch of oligarchs who are like "No you can't vote for socialists because... look at all this culture war stuff! Please keep us in power!"

Fixed it for you. The Dem leadership literally supported the loser of their own primary to avoid Mamdani becoming mayor.

And then when that didn't work or mollify their owner donors, they passed an official resolution condemning socialism. They have never passed any such resolution condemning fascism, in spite of that being the ideology of the ACTUAL enemy.

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 minutes ago

We all need to focus on building class consciousness with everyone we speakto.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago

He's right and anyone who doesn't believe it is one of the lucky ones.

[–] Kintarian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

It's been that way for a long time. The best way to succeed, maybe the only way, is to be born rich.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 43 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Nepo babies are taking every opportunity, and the cute name doesn't change the reality of it.

When enough people realize it, it won't matter how "cool" some of them are.

Generational wealth inequality destroys everything, and it's going to keep getting worse. Not just because the vast majority gets fucked over, but because the people who get to run shit are chosen because how wealthy their daddy was.

The masses can keep shit functional for a while, but once that pattern starts you quickly run into the rich idiots at the top causing so much damage the rest can't keep society moving.

The wealthy are always the ones directly to blame for violent social upheaval, because they were the only ones with the power to fix it without violence. Their iron grip on their parents stolen wealth means there's no other option.

Just a matter of when.

[–] aizakku@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Where are the Carnegie types to build public infrastructure? Y'know, improve the lives of the rest of society that gave them enough power to amass such wealth.

There's no such thing as a "self-made billionaire", it's made off the exploitation of the folks below. Everyone has a great idea or two, but getting lucky isn't just being "God's chosen one" (or whatever nonsense people use to deflect that billionaires existence is unjust). It's full out exploitation in the highest order, but because they toss some breadcrumbs we do the dance for them.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Where are the Carnegie types to build public infrastructure? Y’know, improve the lives of the rest of society that gave them enough power to amass such wealth.

Jesus fucking christ...

They did that stuff so they'd have an excuse to lobby for tax changes

None of that shit was for the good of society, it was to trick idiots into voting for tax cuts for the wealthy.

As soon as they got the tax cuts, the wealthy stopped doing those projects.

Because the sole reason was PR

How the fuck are so many people seeing the broad strokes and not only missing the finer details, but missing who painted the fucking picture.

Gates and even Musk seemed "ok" at one point, they were all pieces of shit their entire lives, they just stopped paying the PR costs

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Thing is, I really don't care if it's just PR, so long as that PR involves taking good actions.

It's the same way how a fear of eternal damnation and hellfire does not by default make you a good person, but it can cause you to perform the same actions as a genuinely good person would. At the end of the day it doesn't matter if you were really feeling it or not, as long as you acted like a good person.

I feel the same way about the rich. I don't really care if you really want to be a good person or not. If some billionaire's entire philanthropic history revolves around strictly just not wanting to get eaten by the peasants, that's fine by me. I don't really care if you really love trans kids in your heart of hearts, but if you donate some of your money to helping them, it keeps you off my dinner menu for another day.

We can't expect the rich to be good people at heart, because that doesn't really ever happen (with some VERY rare and VERY special exceptions), but we can compel "good" behavior out of them if they fear the unwashed masses. For me, that's good enough for most cases.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Thing is, I really don’t care if it’s just PR, so long as that PR involves taking good actions

But you fucking should, that's the entire point I'm making

If we just fucking taxed them, then the wealth would go back into circulation. If we let them pick where to donate, it just makes idiots think letting billionaires be in charge of billions of dollars might not fuck us all.

It always will Even if takes a generation or two, eventually they'll decide that they really should be in charge because they have the most money. The only way to stop it is to stop letting people accumulate that much, and we do that thru taxation.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago

You are pining for a past that does not exist. It’s very similar to MAGA and it’s how they all got tricked, except this is the version that Bill Maher wants you to believe.

Again, the philanthropy was a ruse to get their taxes lowered so they would “have more to give back”.

Their taxes were lowered many times, and here we are. Carved up and stagnant since the 1980s, every gain we make erased, every ladder pulled up. Every third place closed and commercialized; even the entire sport of bowling has been fist-fucked by private equity. No more toy stores; the only hobby store is run by fundamentalist Christian nationalists who harbor stolen ancient artifacts as if Lara Croft was in Leviticus. They’re not just gaining power, they’re fucking styling on us.

Now they want us to only rent from them; from land to software and everything in between.

I’m not going back to a time when we fell for their tricks, this has played out so many times over history. This time, we keep the fucking money and build what society needs. No one needs that kind of unelected power. I don’t care what you built, you didn’t earn that.

[–] aizakku@sh.itjust.works -4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

More than one thing can be true.

I’m just not seeing the goodwill to society from the current billionaires. They’re all ratfucks but at least of yesteryear they tossed us a bone or two.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I’m just not seeing the goodwill to society from the current billionaires

You didn't see it from Carnegie either...

Why the fuck can you not understand this?

They were laying the groundwork so their descendants can say "wealthy businessmen know better than anyone else".

Look at our fucking president, he is the direct and natural consequence of people not understanding what you can't. The difference is most of them didn't have someone desperately trying to help them realize the most basic part of that

But at this point, I'm throwing in the towel on you.

I hope someone can explain this to you later, if not then hopefully you'll at least stop repeating the same billionaire propaganda people have been falling for this time.

Like, you can manage that, right?

If you won't learn how to help us, at least stop fucking helping the billionairez.

Can you do that for the 99.99999% of humans on the planet?

[–] aizakku@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Someone's angry lol.

I mean I'm angry at the billionaires too, but why be angry at me? I'm all about class consciousness and not feeding the machine... but me a) not being American, b) merely suggesting some goodwill from the massive resource extraction by the billionaire class. Why you hating the player and not the game?

I'm just trying to understand where the Epstein class lost their fear? Where are the third spaces like arboretums and libraries being built today by them? I don't see it. Maybe they had fear back then because they had to see their neighbours faces everyday, now we're so disconnected.

But yes, please attack me more it helps us so much.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

David Ellison feels attacked.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

This is it exactly. It’s not necessarily the form of government you’re running, it’s the elites that are running whatever form of government you have.

The only thing that has ever kept elites in check is a people united and willing to do whatever it takes to fix it.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

This is it exactly. It’s not necessarily the form of government you’re running, it’s the elites that are running whatever form of government you have.

That's learned helplessness...

You still can't even imagine a system without elites running everything.

It's not just you, but it's so fucking disappointing it's so prevelant.

Wake the fuck up man, we need all hands on deck and even tho you think you're plugged in your have no idea what you're talking about and youre hurting more than helping.

For fucks sake man, I don't even think you understand what a democracy is. You think u er capitalist wealth inequality is a part of it.

Economy and government are two completely fucking separate things. The vast majority of governmental systems would be fine without the wealth inequality the wealthy always say is a necessary part of every government system

[–] Lon3star@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Unless the US gets back to the pre-1980 tax policies (among many other factors), it's going to become even harder to reach.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Have you tried being a useful sociopath in the tech billionaire cabal. Those guys probably have at least a gas guzzler filled up and a white picket fence to pretend to be a normal human behind

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

If you want the American Dream, you're going to have to get it the same way our grandparents did.

Invade Korea.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Even worse is that having a fair living wage and decent social services is seen as the big meany communism

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

But those government hijacked American Dream™ capitalism dollars are being spent on bombing brown children and ruining everything that isn't directly benefiting billionaires. Isn't that what you wanted, clearly they wouldn't be in power if that's not what the people wanted

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The American dream is a scam. You have a better chance of being bitten by a shark or struck by lightning.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

And you would be lucky to get bit by a shark, it’s not as bad as they say, it’s actually pretty great.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

The "American Dream" is propaganda. Typical single family home in the suburbs, and a "traditional family values" family.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Every State Lottery Office: "Holy shit we got an ad!"

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

What is "The American Dream"?

It always seems to be portrayed idealistically as a single family home in a car dependent suburb. A large driveway, and massive front lawn with a white picket fence. Something like in the image below.

5169

Almost all these similar photos have a "traditional family values vibe", white family, stay at home mom, two kids of different genders. Honestly it all just screams propaganda to me.

On top of all that when you "zoom out", that typical "American Dream" becomes a car dependent hellscape ike the one below. With no way to get around.

5167

I don't know, but not everyone has a wish to live in a place like this. Give me walkable transit oriented mixed use neighborhoods with "missing middle" housing types any day.

Throw in "third-place" public areas where I can hang out with friends and family outside of home and work. Give me regional trains between cities, subways and trams, dedicated bus infrastructure. Give me safe cycling networks and dedicated trails. Give me city parks and fresh produce markets I can walk to.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 8 points 4 hours ago

I'm pretty sure the mayor of New York City is not talking about the suburbs when he says, "American Dream." He means a comfortable life, evenings off work, good schools for your kids, fun vacations, and generally not feeling like you're one accident away from financial ruin.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

The original American dream was independence and self sufficiency which was realized through land grants and farming. At some point, the dream got switched to owning a house that is only a collection of monthly expenses, and without any income-producing potential which farming granted. I'm not sure how many other shifts occurred along the way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Dream