this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
25 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

28710 readers
1079 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. 🇬🇧 Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇺🇸
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 21 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] paskalivichi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The Gordon Ramsey of software

    It's pretty funny that Gordon Ramsey is actually a sweet guy and plays up the angry cook guy on TV.

    [–] Landmammals@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

    In a parallel universe, there's a version of Linus who runs a restaurant that makes noma look like a taco bell.

    [–] lawrence@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

    There is no problem with reusing code, as long as you take some time to understand it.

    [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Linus needs to make no corrections to his behaviour. His apology was needless.

    He only flames those who make dumb mistakes, should know better, keep doing it, and don't respect the gravity of the situation. Linux is used on MARS. Pretend to care.

    There is a pattern to the people who get upset when they've earned a rebuke from Linus. Those people could get over themselves.

    [–] zurohki@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

    Well, kind of.

    Linus needs to call out bad code, it's an important part of Linux's quality control. He doesn't need to tell people to kill themselves.

    [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Ah, this happened two days ago? Further reading:

    Linus Torvalds flames Google kernel contributor over filesystem suggestion

    -The Register

    [–] SpeakinTelnet@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Here's the specific response and it's even better than anticipated.

    https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2401.3/04208.html

    [–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

    His response to Linus was interesting to read.

    Oh and especially this comment further down in the conversation...

    As it is, I feel like I have to waste my time checking all your patches, and I'm saying "it's not worth it".

    I'm basically done with this. I never said I was a VFS guy and I learned a lot doing this. I had really nobody to look at my code even though most of it went to the fsdevel list. Nobody said I was doing it wrong.

    Sorry to have wasted your time

    [–] Xttweaponttx@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    Sheesh. Seeing just how long he goes on tantruming is kinda surprising 😳 seems like the guy was just trying to contribute... ya don't have you shit in mouth, right? Jesus

    [–] natecox@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    [This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

    [–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    The tone may be a bit harsh but it's muuuuch better than how he used to be during his most toxic days. This is how he used to talk: https://www.networkworld.com/article/706908/security-torvalds-to-bad-security-devs-kill-yourself-now.html

    Linus definitely got much better at handling his anger since his public apology in 2018.

    [–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    [I]f you have anything to do with security in a distro, and think that my kids (replace ‘my kids’ with ‘sales people on the road’ if you think your main customers are businesses) need to have the root password to access some wireless network, or to be able to print out a paper, or to change the date-and-time settings, please just kill yourself now. The world will be a better place,” he wrote.

    Hah love it

    I can’t believe linus did a “KILL YOURSELF, NOW” before it was cool

    [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    reads the article

    considers the triggers prompting the outburst

    He’s… not wrong.

    Not right, but definitely not wrong. There is a big difference between effective security and total security. He was dumping on total security, which in many ways is worse than no security at all.

    [–] someacnt_@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

    Indeed, I think he just wanted to get the point across that it is a dangerous approach.

    [–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    It was never a question of being technically right or wrong. Linus' realization was that his inflammatory language was viewed as permission by other people in the Linux community to be verbally abusive to their peers. People who had been valuable contributors to Linux projects explained to Linus how they had been berated by colleagues, and when challenged those colleagues cited Linus' own language.

    What Linus wants is working code, and you don't get working code by giving tacit permission to your most aggressive & abrasive community members to attack others.

    [–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    That’s why I was particularly clear about him being “not right”.

    Because being abusive is definitely “not right”.

    But sometimes you have to make a point and you just have no other way of doing so, because the deed is already done, and anything less shocking is just gonna get ignored wholesale. That foot-stomp has to be loud enough and clear enough to be heard even by the people in the back. And there are only so many (frequently limited!) ways of grabbing everyone’s attention by the nuts.

    I don’t agree with how Linus handled it. But I can understand it.

    [–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

    sometimes you have to make a point and you just have no other way of doing so

    Well, that's just an excuse for bad leadership.

    [–] platypus_plumba@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

    I mean, telling someone to kill themselves is something that I've heard a lot, it usually never means "go and literally do it", it's more of an expression... But the fact that it was used in that context is just disturbing.

    Doesn't mean it's ever the right thing to say.

    Especially among professionals