this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
467 points (98.5% liked)

politics

31220 readers
2267 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Social and news media commenters seize on senator’s gaffe, with some characterizing it as a Freudian slip

With speculation about whether he may defect from the Democratic party swirling around him, US senator John Fetterman described himself seemingly unintentionally as a “lifelong Republican” during a fireside chat in Texas over the weekend.

Fetterman made the comment when someone listening to him speak with CBS News political correspondent Major Garrett at the Texas Tribune Festival on Saturday asked the Pennsylvania senator why he had not become an independent.

“Because I’m a lifelong Republican,” Fetterman replied. Garrett promptly corrected him by saying, “Democrat,” as Fetterman raised a hand and shook his head in disbelief.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 32 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If I stroke out just pull the plug, I can't risk becoming a Republican.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

Dude, he didnt become a republican because of the stroke.

He's always been one. and a piece of shit asshole too

his locals have been saying that from the damn start.

[–] KiloGex@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Why is the senator of Pennsylvania doing at a conference in and about Texas?

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Just republican things. You wouldn't understand.

[–] Denfa@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He’s getting paid to deliver Republican wins. Fetterman loves the money. I doubt he cares which party he aligns with as long as the grift keeps paying.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Practically everyone in office is getting paid to deliver something.

For example, Biden was paid to stop minimum wage.

Trump was paid to invade Iraq.

You can tell what they were paid for by watching what they do. Viola! That's what was paid for.

Dollars are free speech and corporations are people.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

because he is

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 40 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, we know. Dude is just a Republican plant.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I'm convinced that it's his stroke causing a personality change and possibly cognitive decline.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

his locals that have known and dealt with him long before the election have all said he's been a fucking cunt his entire life.

the stroke had nothing to do with anything

[–] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm convinced the stroke was fake and his run as a democrat was a ruse to get elected on false promises

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

oh, did the new rotating villain drop early?

[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 8 points 4 hours ago

I think this one has been teased for a while.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Never trust a motherfucker from York county.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

If you listen to him, he clearly still has issues with speech after the stroke. A speech impediment isn’t inherently disqualifying from being a lawmaker, but such a dramatic change to someone’s brain should have automatically triggered a re-election that allowed the voters to evaluate if he could still perform his duties to the same degree as when he was elected by the people.

[–] Bob_Robertson_IX@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Except, the stroke happened before the election. The stroke happened before the primary.

The people of Pennsylvania elected him to office knowing that he'd had a serious stroke.

[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago

Yeah dog. Welcome to representative politics. The primary was never even close. Stroke was a few days beforehand. His campaign talked up his recovery. Feel free to look up quotes about just needing surgery for a pacemaker and how he’d be fine. All the messaging stayed progressive; campaigns are run by staffers, so him being absent meant nothing for outward appearances. And who would progressives have voted for after he won the primary—Doctor Oz? Or should everyone have banded together to call the Fetrerman campaign liars and form a write in push for one of the primary losers? And risk losing Pennsylvania to DOCTOR OZ?!

Pennsylvanians were lied to and they have no true representation. But there’s no mechanism to fix that. You’re supposed to wait a couple years and just take what you get, because it’s more important that you follow the rules than it is to be heard. And that’s called democracy.

[–] AfterlifeAdventures@lemmy.world 29 points 9 hours ago

Politician finally tells the truth that should be the title

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 49 points 10 hours ago

Fetterman accidentally tells the truth

[–] voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 114 points 11 hours ago

Can't really fault him, ive been making the same mistake thinking he was a lifelong republican all along as well.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 100 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

He definitely said it accidentally. That doesn't make it untrue.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 53 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Tldr:

“Let’s revisit after the midterms, and let’s see what happens – you know – if I happen to be 51,” said Fetterman, who was elected to the US Senate in 2022. “I don’t know.”

If he has to put an R by his name to block Dems, he'll do it.

But the grift money for being the most conservative Dem is a shit ton more than being a random Republican.

So he's not going to do it unless there's a reason, and that would likely come with a lump sum bribe.

He's advertising that he'd be for sale to all the billionaires who want trump to be unaccountable

[–] Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Should be illegal to run as Democrat get elected then switch to other party. If you want to switch Should have to run as that party. If I lived in that state I be PISSED! ASSHOLE should be recalled. The fact that voters in Pennsylvania aren't protesting at the capital demanding just that.

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I don't think political parties should be written into the law at all, but in general the ability to vote to recall a politician should be. Some states are able to do that, and there should be a new election if they are recalled.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I'd support a law that would automatically trigger a recall vote if a sitting representative changes party affiliation.

Of course since states have full control over the election of their representatives I suppose it may have to be 50 laws, but still

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 7 points 9 hours ago (7 children)

I don't get why the Democrats don't just boot him out of the party?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago

Because he takes all the blame while they all get to cash their bribe checks as well.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 hours ago

Because a dino still sits in a blue chair, and for them it can be all about the identity of the chairs in the room.

But yeah. If the numbers swing hard enough on the midterms he won't need to choose sides because it'll be safe enough that they can boot him now and primary him later.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 6 hours ago

If the switched side ne would paraded around as the Spostate and then quickly forgotten

[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 60 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

"Accidentally"...

Either this guy's brain was so deprived of oxygen that it's now unable to lie, or - more likely - he's sending not-so-subtle messages to his soon-to-be new political family.

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

His brain was so deprived of oxygen. Just five more seconds and he'd be a brain dead vegetable. Instead he's got just enough brain function to be a Republican.

[–] chillhelm@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

Also see: McConnelling.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 14 points 9 hours ago

Sorry, John, but this isn’t out of context.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Democrats winning 51 seats will not be enough to resist Trump. He will switch sides and vote maga the rest of his term.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump will just veto anything the Senate passes anyway. The real advantage to having a majority will be to be able to appoint the majority leader and also lead the various subcommittees. Plus it'll better position the Democrats to take a larger majority in 2028 (which is also when Fetterman can be primaried.)

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, exactly. I didn't think anything would get passed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

What a doofus. With "allies" like Uncle Festerman, who the fuck needs political opposition?

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 12 points 9 hours ago

Please dont disparage Uncle Fester. He is loyal to his family and always has been.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Anyone who is loyal to a party is putting a party over their constituents. I'd say whichever party he was going to say is a problem. No representative should be voting for what the "rest of the group" is voting for but rather what the people they represent want. If 65% of his constituents say they want to end U.S. sanctions on Cuba it shouldn't matter what they want, or the party wants, his vote should be to end sanctions on Cuba or be immediately ousted for being corrupt.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 11 hours ago

You are correct about this. The key problem for him specifically is actions are not reflecting what the majority of his voters wanted. But this does also address another problem (not so much for senators but for representatives in the House), the number of people they represent.

We need an expansion of the House and redistricting so that each seat only represents a limit of people, so they can actually talk to those people and know what their interests are. Too large a chuck of population and that becomes muddled, and so party lines is far simpler to manage, assuming the votes still stand. But for local issues, which are often what bills are about, how can party line always be the best option, or even matter? Some things are politically bounded, they're what's best for the people in that region, and if the rep doesn't even really know who that is or what they want...

Granted, they have a staff to do a lot of this, but the population number per is still too high.

Oh, and Fetterman is damaged goods, they need a new senator. Of course, look at Kentucky, they didn't even have one of the senators for 90+ days (and I still have doubts).

load more comments
view more: next ›