this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
486 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

88329 readers
3127 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

There's going to be some fuzzy math hidden behind that article, I'd only expect a 9x difference when comparing lemons with melons, new small electric cars vs older non-hybrid SUVs for example. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if they also ignored less favourable conditions like highway driving or colder temperatures. How they came by their numbers is mostly opaque, but I suspect that this source is pretty biased.

I do believe that if you need a new car and if you can charge at home, that EVs should now be a no brainer for most people. I just don't believe this article.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

My bike is cheaper than a single monthly car payment and it's powered by cheesecake.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I own an EV (in Ireland). I would not say by any stretch I save that much as running a petrol car. It's probably in the order of a third perhaps and that's with a nighttime electricity plan where a kWh might cost 20c which works out about €4 at 15kWh/100km. A petrol car doing 6L/100km would cost about €12 at the moment. If somebody was using public fast chargers they would see very little savings.

There are other expenses like motor taxes, wear & tear (tyres, brakes), servicing, oil changes etc. which might affect the cost. The UK also has a really dumb excise on EVs where they get whalloped with 3p per mile of extra tax. So 100km (62.5miles) is £1.87 of tax to add onto the charge bill. Luckily Ireland doesn't get it but most other expenses are comparable.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

why is it dumb to tax EVs for mileage? aren't ICs taxed similarly through fuel tax?

roads gotta be paid for somehow, and it's fair to tax actual usage

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It wouldn't be dumb if ICE vehicles were also taxed the same way but they're not. There would be nothing to stop the UK government abolishing fuel tax and slapping 6p a mile or whatever on ICE vehicles

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 7 hours ago

It wouldn’t be dumb if ICE vehicles were also taxed the same way but they’re not.

Petroleum is taxed per liter. A car goes X km per liter. So the current petroleum tax is effectively per km, or close enough.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The mileage tax on average will make average petrol cars pay double what EVs will be paying in road taxes ( and it's not even happening until 2028).

[–] JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, i charge myne primarily with home solar, so its free.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I often get paid for charging mine. They paid me 30p on Sunday.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

How?

(No need to go into too much detail as I'm not in the UK; I'm just curious)

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I assume that electricity price sometimes goes negative when excess is produced, resulting in some providers paying you for using electricity at that time.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

🤔 Interesting. I never even considered what happens if excess energy is produced

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago

It's precisely that. The winds blows and the sun shines, then suddenly the power company would rather pay their customers to use more power than pay the generators penalty fees to turn off.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Progress of EV's will be complete eventually but those oil company barons and tycoons sure made it stretch out and cost a lot more.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I expect they will keep trying to hold back EVs and compete forever, so never let your guard down. There will always be someone, somewhere, wanting to pump oil and feed it to a combustion engine for money. They'll say it's their culture, for Jesus, for their family, to feed baby koalas, to revive a poor dead rat, or whatever it takes to burn some form of petroleum, change climate, and try to buy a yacht or an island.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 2 points 7 hours ago

They can burn their wallet if they like, I'll enjoy cheaper alternatives.

[–] auzy1@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

And there are so many people "triggered" by it

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I had a coworker go on an insane rant about his hatred of EVs after somebody mentioned Teslas. I wound him up even more by saying I'm fine with EVs just not ones built by Nazis.

[–] percent@infosec.pub 2 points 8 hours ago

🤔 I've never even thought about researching the people who built any vehicle I've ever purchased. Where do you start?

[–] nodiratime@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago
[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›