I hope I never gave them that. I had Nitro for a bit, but I don't think I would have ever willingly gave them that.
this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
613 points (86.2% liked)
Technology
88221 readers
3239 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
We told you this would happen. We told you this would be the result of "age verification". As usual, you fucking didn't listen.
I hope Discord is sued into receivership over this.
Nothing came of this.
Or ever will.
load more comments
(2 replies)
So so so so so misleading to post this when this will be interpreted as an event from 2026. Post should be removed IMO.
There's a 2025 in the title
I get that. I mean, that's how I knew to come down here and say that it was misleading. But surely we can agree it's strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what's been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news. Like, the 2025 part is only needed because the post is misleading to begin with
But surely we can agree it's strange to post something a year old on this particular community. especially something like this, that in context of what's been going on with Discord really makes it seem like fresh news.
Now that Discord has begun rolling out the ID verification that they postponed a few months ago, I think it's a pretty important reminder. And as was said, the post title specifically says "(2025)"
Hmmm yeah that's fair. I wasn't seeing it that way
Stop reading the details a knee jerk with the rest of us nerd
Who could've seen that coming?
Certainly not anyone who objected to the practice.
As far as discord is concerned, I’m a proud citizen of Albania now. Much like Eric Adams.
Wao, again? The reasons why people keep using these bullshit services really make my mind spin. This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.
Edit: I just saw this is from last year's leak. Still, the likeness remains.
The comparison answers your question actually.
Comfort. There's a certain amount of comfort when you're within an abusive relationship. Yes, it's awful, yes you're being hurt over and over again, but you're familiar with it. You know what to expect, where as taking the leap and leaving for the unknown can be scary.
Okay, there's no difference?
None
There's people whose lives are at risk if they leave Discord?
This is no different than people choosing to stay in a relationship with an abusing partner.
I say that about Windows users who jump through hoops to try to disable the spying and they get mad at me, LOL.
Yup.
I thought that they were deleting the photos immediately after verification. They didn't??? Why aren't these companies being investigated and punished?
This is from the leak last year. What leaked was pictures uploaded to their ticket system to appeal the result of a failed verification.
...so you are saying their verification process is so broken that hundreds of thousands of people had to appeal a false reading. Broken and insecure, what a look.
It depends on the ratio of failed to successful, really. If there are hundreds of millions of successful verifications, that's a fairly low failure rate.
Because money. We'll soon have to take things into our own hands, as the establishment only protects itself, and not us plebs.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm glad you added from 2025 there because otherwise it would have been super deceptive.
I definitely thought it happened again, and I was gonna be like, well that was fast. Like we all know it's going to happen again, but that would have been extremely fast.
It's still deceptive. The title should indicate that.
This is old news. It didn't happen a second time.
Yeah, they've changed. This time they'll keep the data safe, for realsies, pinky promise. Im sure they even gave their employees a stern talking to!
load more comments
(12 replies)
Wow, and now they want to relay your info through 2 or 3 parties for verications.
This article is dated "9 October 2025" which would make it almost a year old.
load more comments
(4 replies)
How am I just now hearing about this?
Right? I didnt know about it.
This article is a year old, but relevant because Discord started doing the verifications again. The plan was never canceled, just delayed to a later news cycle. And this will absolutely happen again because there are no consequences.
view more: next ›